NFFC Message Boards

Originally posted by Raiders:
"On Play means, Nothing" he's a RB on Stats. Don't make it too hard. Or don't over think it. [/QB][/quote]

With regards to scoring for the defense he is a qb. If he tucks the ball and runs it's a tackle for a loss, if he attempts to pass and gets tackled it's a sack.

He is a qb on the play

In my mind he was the best rb in the game at the end of 2006 (even with tomlinson going crazy)

Injuries have derailed him the last couple years and now his team is awful. Put him on a decent team and he breaks the total yards record, catches 65 balls and scores 18 tds.

Normally I would wait and see but there's been so many bagels this year by above average players that I think he's worth the risk.

I wouldn't be in favor of crediting the individual player points but I REALLY wouldn't be in favor of giving double points on the play. Someone that had the broncos d and royal would be credited with 4 tds??? I know this happens with a qb throwing to your wr/rb but at least that's 2 players involved...

Originally posted by larry schechter:
I lost my main event game last night by .35 when Stokley caught a TD at the end of the game. Stokley was the only guy left in our game after Sunday, and he needed 11.05 points to tie the game. What sucks even more is that wasn't even a td.

I would spend the entire 1000 on wr help.

How could you drop them the week they play the bills?

He's been productive in a base offense but he runs the wildcat flawlessly. His vision and patience in setting up his blocks work perfect.

Not tough at all. Andre is a receiver that you NEVER sit. It's not like they're playing the 85 bears.