Tom,
Is it accurate for a receiver that has -4 rushing yards to have -0.4 deducted from his score? I don't see any negative scoring in the rules with the exception of turnovers, so I don't think this should be deducted. The player in question for me is Jerry Porter.
Thanks.
Search found 41 matches
- Mon Sep 20, 2004 4:26 pm
- Forum: General NFFC Discussion
- Topic: Scoring - Negative Points
- Replies: 30
- Views: 14815
- Sat Sep 18, 2004 12:21 am
- Forum: General NFFC Discussion
- Topic: Post high bids from your league here
- Replies: 11
- Views: 4239
Post high bids from your league here
C. Wilson - $315
E. Parker - $207
C. Lewis - $201
J. Gaffney - $127
E. Parker - $207
C. Lewis - $201
J. Gaffney - $127
- Fri Sep 17, 2004 12:22 pm
- Forum: Ask The NFFC A Question
- Topic: LAMAR GORDON
- Replies: 108
- Views: 38242
LAMAR GORDON
He wasn't even available in our league - believe it or not the Chicago #1 was a very tough draft. Just about every remotely useful player was taken (but not Buckhalter, Shipp, and various other useless players). Unfortunately for the big spenders, my prediction (for what its worth) is that you can c...
- Fri Sep 17, 2004 10:41 am
- Forum: Ask The NFFC A Question
- Topic: Draft rating
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4370
Draft rating
I would say that if you truly have a draft rating that high, you were probably in one of those leagues that were high on Buckhalter, Shipp, and other fantasy giants.
- Fri Sep 17, 2004 10:39 am
- Forum: Ask The NFFC A Question
- Topic: Draft rating
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4370
Draft rating
Yes, something is wrong with the rating unless of course LT truly went at an average pick of 3.56. I can't believe that is true.
- Wed Sep 15, 2004 2:29 am
- Forum: Ask The NFFC A Question
- Topic: Live Scoring
- Replies: 56
- Views: 22016
Live Scoring
Greg, Not to beat a dead horse, but my team score on my league home page lists us #1 with a score of 160.95. This does not match with the "Overall Standing" which lists us at 159.95. We are the only team that I have identified among the leaders with this discrepency. I think its the Deion Branch non...
- Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:00 pm
- Forum: General NFFC Discussion
- Topic: Proof that picking WRs is better and the RB people are wrong
- Replies: 19
- Views: 7340
Proof that picking WRs is better and the RB people are wrong
Why does everyone assume the 3rd RB is a loser?
LOL - C. Martin 196 - 3 rec - 2 TDs. RB looks right to me.
LOL - C. Martin 196 - 3 rec - 2 TDs. RB looks right to me.
- Wed Sep 08, 2004 1:17 pm
- Forum: General NFFC Discussion
- Topic: WR vs RB in Flex
- Replies: 88
- Views: 30273
WR vs RB in Flex
Excuse me 13 - I thought I better correct that one before numerous angry responses came my way.
- Wed Sep 08, 2004 1:16 pm
- Forum: General NFFC Discussion
- Topic: WR vs RB in Flex
- Replies: 88
- Views: 30273
WR vs RB in Flex
In using C. Martin as an example, dont forget that Testaverde was his QB for the first half of the year (never scored less than 14 after that). Not to mention, Kitna had a career year, which I think will be tough to match for young Palmer.
- Sun Sep 05, 2004 8:53 am
- Forum: General NFFC Discussion
- Topic: So how did everyone do?
- Replies: 112
- Views: 33669
So how did everyone do?
Whoever did the calculation for a RB vs a WR was correct - but they neglected the fact that certain RBs will catch many passes (even though only 0.5 pt + yards) therby making them much more valuable than a 1000yd WR. I'll take Duce Staley, Q.Griffith, or even C. Martin over all but the top 8-9 recei...