Week 7 Scoring Changes

Greg Ambrosius · Post by **Greg Ambrosius** » Thu Oct 23, 2008 2:28 am

Elias made several IDP scoring changes yesterday, but I believe these are the only offensive scoring changes of note for Week 7 that affected NFFC teams:

Bal -1.0 Yards Lost From Being Sacked for Joe Flacco
Bal +1.0 Rushing Attempts for Joe Flacco
Bal -1.0 Rushing Yards for Joe Flacco
StL -1.0 Passing Completions for Marc Bulger
StL -1.0 Passing Attempts for Marc Bulger
StL -10.0 Passing Yards for Marc Bulger
StL +1.0 Rushing Attempts for Donnie Avery
StL +10.0 Rushing Yards for Donnie Avery
StL -1.0 Receptions for Donnie Avery
StL -10.0 Receiving Yards for Donnie Avery

INIT2WINIT · Post by **INIT2WINIT** » Thu Oct 23, 2008 4:39 am

HOW ABOUT DEF SCORING CHANGES??

INIT2WINIT · Post by **INIT2WINIT** » Thu Oct 23, 2008 4:54 am

DEF LOST 6 POINTS, I THOUGHT STATS CHANGED R. DAVIS FUMBLE RECOVERY TO A SPECIAL TEAMS TD. SINCE IT DOES NOT SHOW UP ON THE OFFENSE SIDE OF THE STATS. OR ON THE STAT LINE FOR DAVIS????

Sound Advice · Post by **Sound Advice** » Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:00 am

Stats did credit the fumble to Chi def.

INIT2WINIT · Post by **INIT2WINIT** » Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:29 am

then there should be 2 fumble rec.

Greg Ambrosius · Post by **Greg Ambrosius** » Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:30 am

Originally posted by INIT2WINIT:
then there should be 2 fumble rec. The Chicago defense scoring is correct. It should be 24 points and it is now.

Greg Ambrosius · Post by **Greg Ambrosius** » Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:31 am

Originally posted by INIT2WINIT:
HOW ABOUT DEF SCORING CHANGES?? One scoring change of note that I missed above: The Dolphins' Defense lost a point because of the
Flacco sack turning into a rush.

INIT2WINIT · Post by **INIT2WINIT** » Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:47 am

thanks greg!!

Sandman62 · Post by **Sandman62** » Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:43 pm

Originally posted by Greg Ambrosius:
quote:Originally posted by INIT2WINIT:
then there should be 2 fumble rec. The Chicago defense scoring is correct. It should be 24 points and it is now. [/QUOTE]Gee, I guess only a MORON would sit them then?!

I read that they were missing 3 or 4 of their corners, so I figured [correctly] that MIN would hang 40+ on them. So... having just acquired the WAS DST (to cover CHI's week 8 bye), I thought "WAS is facing CLE at home and should hold them to about 10 pts". Correct again (11). However, I should've listened to my partner (my 14YO son) who said "Yeah Dad, but MIN has about the worst special teams in the league. Look what Bush did to them."

I vetoed his vote though and went w/ WAS at 12:50 on Sunday. Though they certainly held CLE down better than CHI held MIN down, CHI scored 24 and WAS only 5. Ugh!

Fortunately, we lost by more than 19 anyway. (I <b>guess</b> that's "fortunate" in some parts of the world?)