Question on Peyton Fumble

HOF
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 6:00 pm

Question on Peyton Fumble

Post by HOF » Sun Oct 20, 2013 7:52 pm

Since it resulted in a safety isnt that a fumble lost and should be minus points?

Its obvious it was a negative play for the team that resulted in pts for the other team.

Sorry if i am missing something.

TR
Posts: 634
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:00 pm

Re: Question on Peyton Fumble

Post by TR » Sun Oct 20, 2013 7:57 pm

Yes it should be minus 1 for manning

mattjb
Posts: 1651
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:00 pm

Re: Question on Peyton Fumble

Post by mattjb » Sun Oct 20, 2013 7:58 pm

TR wrote:Yes it should be minus 1 for manning
the fumble wasn't recovered by the other team so therefore wasn't 'lost' so I am not sure it should be.

particra
Posts: 753
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 6:00 pm

Re: Question on Peyton Fumble

Post by particra » Sun Oct 20, 2013 7:59 pm

No it's not. The ball was never recovered by Indy. It was fumbled out of bounds and therefore not considered a turnover. The fact that it happened in the end zone doesn't change that.

HOF
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 6:00 pm

Re: Question on Peyton Fumble

Post by HOF » Sun Oct 20, 2013 8:05 pm

Might be something to look at...I mean if a play results in POINTS for the OTHER team it should count against you ...no?

Thanks

JD CUBE
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 6:00 pm

Re: Question on Peyton Fumble

Post by JD CUBE » Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:42 am

The other posts have it right. The fumble was not recovered by Indy and therefore there is no point deduction. It is as if Manning fumbled the ball out of bounds without the opposing team recovering the ball. There is no point deduction in that case. That it was a safety (i.e. fumbled through the end zone) makes no difference.

HOF
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 6:00 pm

Re: Question on Peyton Fumble

Post by HOF » Mon Oct 21, 2013 3:52 pm

Oh i know.....at the end of the day its me being desperate in hopes of beating a Peyton led team this week.

BAH! lol

Thanks for the replies though. Makes sense obviously

JD CUBE
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 6:00 pm

Re: Question on Rueben Randle fumble

Post by JD CUBE » Tue Oct 22, 2013 7:38 am

Since Randle does not get credit for a TD on a punt return, why is he penalized for losing a fumble on a punt return? I have never considered the "only downside" in terms of point issues in having a player who played on special teams.

JETS SB
Posts: 576
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 9:10 am

Re: Question on Rueben Randle fumble

Post by JETS SB » Tue Oct 22, 2013 7:39 am

JD CUBE wrote:Since Randle does not get credit for a TD on a punt return, why is he penalized for losing a fumble on a punt return? I have never considered the "only downside" in terms of point issues in having a player who played on special teams.
He would get credit for a TD under the new rule - From the rules - "NEW FOR 2013: Individual players who also score a TD on special teams will receive 6 points for their fantasy teams."
Last edited by JETS SB on Tue Oct 22, 2013 7:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Tom Kessenich
Posts: 29324
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 6:00 pm

Re: Question on Rueben Randle fumble

Post by Tom Kessenich » Tue Oct 22, 2013 7:40 am

JD CUBE wrote:Since Randle does not get credit for a TD on a punt return
He would get credit on a punt return TD. All individual players are now awarded TDs for special teams touchdowns if they score on a return. We added that rule for this season.
Tom Kessenich
Manager of High Stakes Fantasy Games, SportsHub Technologies
Twitter - @TomKessenich

Post Reply