Additional 2008 Rules_Changes?

Greg Ambrosius
Posts: 35931
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 6:00 pm

Additional 2008 Rules_Changes?

Post by Greg Ambrosius » Sat Jan 05, 2008 8:51 am

Originally posted by Tamuscarecrow:
Gerard and I were just throwing this around after the WCOFF draft as Gerard was still grumbling about how bad the customer service was and how he would love for Greg to do this. The fact it may happen will certainly bring a smile to his face and his return to the NFFC. A smile to Gerard's face. Wow, now that's a job well done!!! :D Stay tuned, that's all I can say. :D
Founder, National Fantasy Football Championship & National Fantasy Baseball Championship
Twitter: @GregAmbrosius

BillyWaz
Posts: 10913
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 6:00 pm

Additional 2008 Rules_Changes?

Post by BillyWaz » Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:42 am

Originally posted by Greg Ambrosius:
Lance, 13 weeks for sure and three weeks for Championship Round. Honestly, I haven't finalized that, but I think a repeat of Weeks 1 and 2 in matchups isn't the end of the world. I'm not a fan of a league title game and I'd just run 13 regular season matchups with two teams meeting up twice randomly.

I'd love to hear your thoughts. I could see this being a potential problem Greg.

While I agree 100% with having a 13 week regular season (as opposed to 11), and not having a title game to determine who wins each league, I could see some issues of "who plays who" those 2 extra weeks.

There are already people who don't like a pre-determined schedule for a 14 team league, so when team A plays two tough teams in weeks 12 and 13, and team B plays two cupcakes in weeks 12 and 13, I think it could be an issue.

If their truly is a random way to make a schedule (meaning each league is different), then it may work. However, I'm afraid even if it is random, someone will either figure out some pattern, and their no doubt will be plenty of bitching when things don't go right.

ultimatefs
Posts: 2393
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 6:00 pm

Additional 2008 Rules_Changes?

Post by ultimatefs » Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:27 am

Week 12 and 13 all play with top 6 getting W, and bottom 6 getting L.

How many would quit 14 team leagues?
Jules is a Dirt bag and makes my luck.

pizzatyme
Posts: 3528
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:00 pm

Additional 2008 Rules_Changes?

Post by pizzatyme » Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:46 am

12 team all-play would be fantastic.
2008- Didn't finish last overall in the Classic.
2009- Didn't finish last overall in the Classic or Primetime.

pizzatyme
Posts: 3528
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:00 pm

Additional 2008 Rules_Changes?

Post by pizzatyme » Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:49 am

Originally posted by JohnZ:
Week 12 and 13 all play with top 6 getting W, and bottom 6 getting L.

How many would quit 14 team leagues? Great suggestion there John!

I'd be up for this versus the 14 teamer.
2008- Didn't finish last overall in the Classic.
2009- Didn't finish last overall in the Classic or Primetime.

BillyWaz
Posts: 10913
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 6:00 pm

Additional 2008 Rules_Changes?

Post by BillyWaz » Sat Jan 05, 2008 11:41 am

Originally posted by JohnZ:
Week 12 and 13 all play with top 6 getting W, and bottom 6 getting L.

How many would quit 14 team leagues? This is a GREAT idea!

You still have the H2H through 11 weeks, and the last 2 it is all about the points.

More importantly, no one could complain, they played a harder team, or easier team.

Nice job John! :D

User avatar
kjduke
Posts: 3237
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 6:00 pm

Additional 2008 Rules_Changes?

Post by kjduke » Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:46 pm

Originally posted by BillyWaz:
quote:Originally posted by JohnZ:
Week 12 and 13 all play with top 6 getting W, and bottom 6 getting L.

How many would quit 14 team leagues? This is a GREAT idea!

You still have the H2H through 11 weeks, and the last 2 it is all about the points.

More importantly, no one could complain, they played a harder team, or easier team.

Nice job John! :D
[/QUOTE]good UFS, now back to baseball for me

Mike Costaglio
Posts: 146
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 6:00 pm

Additional 2008 Rules_Changes?

Post by Mike Costaglio » Sat Jan 05, 2008 2:26 pm

Is there a chance to run a 12 team format as a points league (no H2H)? We could have a 13 week reular season competition without H2H concerns.

BillyWaz
Posts: 10913
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 6:00 pm

Additional 2008 Rules_Changes?

Post by BillyWaz » Sat Jan 05, 2008 2:41 pm

Originally posted by Mike Costaglio:
Is there a chance to run a 12 team format as a points league (no H2H)? We could have a 13 week reular season competition without H2H concerns. Doubtful with the amount of people they are probably trying to attract here.

As much as H2H can frustrate me at times, it is a needed necessity of a high stakes contest of this magnitude.

Without it, 1/2 the teams would be giving up by Week 6. That would also affect teams picking up players on the WW, which would help some leagues more than others, etc.

Greg Ambrosius
Posts: 35931
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 6:00 pm

Additional 2008 Rules_Changes?

Post by Greg Ambrosius » Sun Jan 06, 2008 2:12 am

Originally posted by JohnZ:
Week 12 and 13 all play with top 6 getting W, and bottom 6 getting L.

How many would quit 14 team leagues? I knew I kept you around for a reason. ;)
Founder, National Fantasy Football Championship & National Fantasy Baseball Championship
Twitter: @GregAmbrosius

Post Reply