Post
by Greg Ambrosius » Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:28 am
I will admit that I've enjoyed reading a wild exchange on the WCOFF boards today about the merits and needs of 3RR and KDS. Not to call anyone out, but some of our own NFFC owners are on opposite sides of the debate and 3RR is still being called as a one-year knee jerk decision by myself and the NFFC.
Just to make the facts clear here: This really wasn't a one-year knee jerk reaction by yours truly. NOTHING upsets me more in running this contest than picking the draft spots and having folks complain to me and Tom about where they ended up. It got so bad that I just totally REFUSED to even touch the draft slips and I made Tom always do it. I didn't want ANY part in making someone upset.
When we instituted KDS in 2006, the over-riding preferences for football were 1,2,3. I mean, it was almost unanimous and so for someone in the NFFC to say on the WCOFF boards that we don't know that everyone's preference would be No. 1 this year is ridiculous. I have the proven facts that everyone wanted the top spots last year without 3RR. Now with 3RR, folks are willing to move down rather than up, but for the most part, 12 or 13 or 14 out of 14 owners in each league will still make 1 their No. 1 choice this year in the NFFC EVEN WITH 3RR!!
So let's set the facts straight: When people have a choice for their draft preference in a regular serpentine football draft, they WILL overwhelmingly pick one of the top spots. It's no problem if leagues are set up that way and I don't fault the WCOFF for never changing from that format. But if you talk with your customers, you'll find that finding some form of draft spot equality is one of their biggest concerns and that's what KDS/3RR does.
The argument over there is based on sentiments about change, not the facts about what the customer ultimately wants. Given a choice, they will take the fairest possible format. And I think KDS/3RR will ultimately give everyone that.
Now what are the downsides of 3RR? Could 18 of the top 32 teams this year come from the 12, 13 and 14 spots? Absolutely, which would mean we'd have the exact same scenario as last year when 1,2,3 produced 18 of the top 32 teams. Would that be a fault of 3RR or would owners kick themselves for not setting their KDS as 14, 13, 12, 1, 2, etc.? See, we're giving you the choice to pick your draft slot, so if the bottom picks succeed this year don't blame 3RR. You probably had a chance to draft down there through KDS and you'll set your preferences accordingly in 2008.
And if LT, LJ and SJ come back to normal levels, will that lesser the value of the top three picks? Probably not. 3RR isn't throwing the entire draft upside down and in fact there are some owners who feel 3RR HELPS the top three picks with an early fourth round selection. We'll see.
Yes, this is an unproven system that is new, but I want everyone to know that I didn't hastily do this after LT's big year last year. That was preceeded by Alexander's record year and before that Terrell Davis's big year, Faulk's big year, Emmitt's big year, etc. Those big years made EVERYONE want the first pick (including me) and I trust in the WCOFF everyone wants a top three pick this year too. That's okay. Nothing wrong with it. But KDS/3RR will make us announcing the draft picks easier this year, it will make receiving your draft spot easier and I'm TOTALLY convinced that it will make each NFFC league MUCH more competitively balanced this year.
Now debate the merits all you want. But please stick to the facts, even if you enjoy always taking the opposite view of things.
Founder, National Fantasy Football Championship & National Fantasy Baseball Championship
Twitter: @GregAmbrosius