H2H Exposed Part 1

ultimatefs
Posts: 2393
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 6:00 pm

H2H Exposed Part 1

Post by ultimatefs » Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:20 am

"Of course not, but if a guy is the league's overall top scorer but is in the bottom half of weekly scoring half the time, I would not consider him deserving of the league title. "


Please show me one instance of this.

Are there really teams scoring 190 in four weeks, and 90 in the other five?

That team would be in a playoff at the end and would have a tough time winning over 3 weeks.

RT would be 7-2 in the half/half thing in LV1. That's all I have access to.

[ November 06, 2008, 03:22 PM: Message edited by: JohnZ ]
Jules is a Dirt bag and makes my luck.

User avatar
kjduke
Posts: 3237
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 6:00 pm

H2H Exposed Part 1

Post by kjduke » Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:25 am

Originally posted by JohnZ:
"Of course not, but if a guy is the league's overall top scorer but is in the bottom half of weekly scoring half the time, I would not consider him deserving of the league title. "


Please show me one instance of this.

Are there really teams scoring 190 in four weeks, and 90 in the other five?

That team would be in a playoff at the end and would have a tough time winning over 3 weeks.

RT would be 7-2 in the half/half thing in LV1. That's all I have access to. In LV4 Hammerheads leads in points scored. But in four of nine weeks he has been in the lower half of weekly scoring (so would have a 5-4 record on the league side of DH concept).

He's a perfect boom-bust example, not a 190/90 guy but top 4 vs bottom 4 weeks average is 171/114.

[ November 06, 2008, 03:29 PM: Message edited by: KJ Duke ]

ultimatefs
Posts: 2393
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 6:00 pm

H2H Exposed Part 1

Post by ultimatefs » Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:30 am

Originally posted by KJ Duke:
quote:Originally posted by JohnZ:
"Of course not, but if a guy is the league's overall top scorer but is in the bottom half of weekly scoring half the time, I would not consider him deserving of the league title. "


Please show me one instance of this.

Are there really teams scoring 190 in four weeks, and 90 in the other five?

That team would be in a playoff at the end and would have a tough time winning over 3 weeks.

RT would be 7-2 in the half/half thing in LV1. That's all I have access to. In LV4 Hammerheads leads in points scored. But in four of nine weeks he has been in the lower half of weekly scoring (so would have a 5-4 record on the league side of DH concept).

He's a perfect boom-bust example, not a 190/90 guy but top 3 vs bottom 3 weeks average is 176/110.
[/QUOTE]4 of 9 is not half!! LOL.


You found ONE team that MIGHT fit your concern.

I bet I can find a DOZEN 3rd place teams that are within 50 points of the number FIVE team in their league and don't deserve a shot at winning the title.

[ November 06, 2008, 03:31 PM: Message edited by: JohnZ ]
Jules is a Dirt bag and makes my luck.

User avatar
kjduke
Posts: 3237
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 6:00 pm

H2H Exposed Part 1

Post by kjduke » Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:31 am

I just looked at my league John, I don't think this will be the case in every league, but it does happen.

[ November 06, 2008, 03:39 PM: Message edited by: KJ Duke ]

ultimatefs
Posts: 2393
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 6:00 pm

H2H Exposed Part 1

Post by ultimatefs » Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:39 am

Wow.. LV4...

you are 6-3 with 1052.7

Hammerheads are 5-4 with 1280.7.


I can see why you use the word "luck" so frequently today.

I would hope that most here would rather see the argument be more against teams with 1052.7 making the playoffs in any possible way than teams with 1280.7.
Jules is a Dirt bag and makes my luck.

User avatar
kjduke
Posts: 3237
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 6:00 pm

H2H Exposed Part 1

Post by kjduke » Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:44 am

Originally posted by JohnZ:
Wow.. LV4...

you are 6-3 with 1052.7

Hammerheads are 5-4 with 1280.7.


I can see why you use the word "luck" so frequently today.

I would hope that most here would rather see the argument be more against teams with 1052.7 making the playoffs in any possible way than teams with 1280.7. And I could've easily been 7-2 if not for gargbage time for Chris Cooley last week. As you can see, my personal team does not rule how I think the rules should be.

BTW, my auction team currently is 1st in points yet only 5-4.

Gordon Gekko
Posts: 7222
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 6:00 pm

H2H Exposed Part 1

Post by Gordon Gekko » Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:48 am

Originally posted by Greg Ambrosius:
The topic headline is H2H Exposed. Part 1 :D
Is my "weekend warrior" prep better than your prep?

User avatar
kjduke
Posts: 3237
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 6:00 pm

H2H Exposed Part 1

Post by kjduke » Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:56 am

Keep it coming Gek. ;) Some good ideas tossed by various posters over the last day or two.

[ November 06, 2008, 03:57 PM: Message edited by: KJ Duke ]

ultimatefs
Posts: 2393
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 6:00 pm

H2H Exposed Part 1

Post by ultimatefs » Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:00 am

Originally posted by KJ Duke:
quote:Originally posted by JohnZ:
Wow.. LV4...

you are 6-3 with 1052.7

Hammerheads are 5-4 with 1280.7.


I can see why you use the word "luck" so frequently today.

I would hope that most here would rather see the argument be more against teams with 1052.7 making the playoffs in any possible way than teams with 1280.7. And I could've easily been 7-2 if not for gargbage time for Chris Cooley last week. As you can see, my personal team does not rule how I think the rules should be.

BTW, my auction team currently is 1st in points yet only 5-4.
[/QUOTE]all 60 minutes of the game count. I draft garbage time players ;) That's why I'm doing well!!

My SAT team is 22.6 behind #1 in pts, 50 ahead of #3 in pts, and is 4-5.
Jules is a Dirt bag and makes my luck.

User avatar
kjduke
Posts: 3237
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 6:00 pm

H2H Exposed Part 1

Post by kjduke » Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:13 am

I'm not saying all 60 dont count John, I'm saying that my team was on the verge of being even more un-deserving of a good record.

Meanwhile, suppose team #3 outscores you by 51 over the next few weeks but has a crappy team heading into the playoffs - don't you think its more fair that you're both in for the final 3 weeks? Also, haven't you learned not to do a victory dance with the season just 80% over? Need I bring up the NFBC. :eek: :D

[ November 06, 2008, 04:17 PM: Message edited by: KJ Duke ]

Post Reply