Snake Classic

williamhare
Posts: 462
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 6:00 pm

Snake Classic

Post by williamhare » Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:03 am

Should these standings not be by POINT TOTAL?
That is the basis for both seeding and payout
if I read rules correctly.
HMan83

Route Collectors
Posts: 3525
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 6:00 pm

Snake Classic

Post by Route Collectors » Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:04 am

I like my chances. :D

BillyWaz
Posts: 10913
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 6:00 pm

Snake Classic

Post by BillyWaz » Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:45 am

Originally posted by Hman83:
Should these standings not be by POINT TOTAL?
That is the basis for both seeding and payout
if I read rules correctly.
HMan83 HMan83,

Since Snake is no longer the points leader, he will put the rankings where it makes him APPEAR to be the superior team. You will soon figure out he does this in EVERY league he is in. :rolleyes:

After he doesn't have the best record or total points, my guess he will probably rank the teams based on the fewest number of letters in their team name and the team name has to be only one word!

[ October 09, 2007, 12:05 PM: Message edited by: BillyWaz ]

williamhare
Posts: 462
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 6:00 pm

Snake Classic

Post by williamhare » Tue Oct 09, 2007 6:52 am

See your Aug 15th post this thread (page 88).

It mirrors Auction----- but Auction rules have been adjusted from 2006.
Standings based on W-L only show the race for the #2 seed. $400 goes to POINTS leader after
13 weeks. And you capitalized POINTS just as I did above.
HMan83

williamhare
Posts: 462
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 6:00 pm

Snake Classic

Post by williamhare » Tue Oct 09, 2007 7:11 am

No prob serpent.
HMan83

Gordon Gekko
Posts: 7222
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 6:00 pm

Snake Classic

Post by Gordon Gekko » Tue Oct 09, 2007 7:11 am

Originally posted by SNAKE:
thanks much JEALOUS Wazass...SNAKE Snake: do u think WAZZ is jealous of your success?

[ October 09, 2007, 01:12 PM: Message edited by: Gordon Gekko ]
Is my "weekend warrior" prep better than your prep?

Post Reply