Week 6 Top 30

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 9:07 am

Originally posted by Tom Kessenich:
Is that your team Gordon? Told ya Dunn would be great value in the 4th round or later.

can he play wr?

JerseyPaul · Post by **JerseyPaul** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 9:09 am

Barber at 4.2 once and 3.13 three times! Warrick Dunn available at 3.13 and 4.2

Man, I guess NY6 was just too tough. Barber at 3.7 and Dunn at 3.11.

Tom Kessenich · Post by **Tom Kessenich** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 9:10 am

He used to be able to catch passes. Does that count?

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 9:18 am

Originally posted by JerseyPaul:
Barber at 4.2 once and 3.13 three times! Warrick Dunn available at 3.13 and 4.2

Man, I guess NY6 was just too tough. Barber at 3.7 and Dunn at 3.11. FA high bids in the tough ny 6...
Player Bid
Rabih Abdullah 375
Amos Zereoue 895
Leonard Henry 728
Derrick Blaylock 501
Lamar Gordon 976

TamuScarecrow · Post by **TamuScarecrow** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 10:14 am

Tom, will you still be bragging on Dunn when Duckett puts him on the bench for good this week except for 3rd down duty? And that's if Jim Mora, Jr. decides he wants to see Vick get killed when a linebacker runs smoothe over Dunn to do it like last week.

Tom Kessenich · Post by **Tom Kessenich** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 10:23 am

If Dunn can stay healthy, I think he'll be a very nice fantasy RB all season long. That said, I do think Duckett will continue to have a role and there will be some weeks where he steps up nicely. If Dunn gets hurt, Duckett will be huge in fantasy leagues.

TamuScarecrow · Post by **TamuScarecrow** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 10:40 am

Reports down here were that Dunn wasn't pulled because of injury. Jim Mora, Jr. wouldn't elaborate on it but he's the one who said it. Could have been the hamstring but in watching the whole game last week I can tell you he sure wasn't happy with Dunn while hollering at him on the sidelines last week. Worth keeping an eye on.

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 10:52 am

Originally posted by TamuScarecrow:
Could have been the hamstring but in watching the whole game last week I can tell you he sure wasn't happy with Dunn while hollering at him on the sidelines last week. sounds like me and my co-manager

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 11:30 am

Originally posted by LB Big Richards:
quote:Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:
quote:Originally posted by Greg Ambrosius:
I believe the WCOFF and NFFC will continue to grow and excel in future years as there's enough room in this marketplace for two good high-stakes events and possibly more. We need to grow this area of the marketplace, not undercut each other the nffc has something the wcoff lost. advantage nffc [/QUOTE]Gordon, I met you in Vegas and you seem to be a regular guy, but man, if anyone hasn't mentioned this to you already, let me be the first - it's not always about you

. [/QUOTE]i took a 2nd look at your post. it's interesting that you jumped right to the conclusion i was talking about myself.

others could have took it as....the nffc has something the wcoff lost:
1. customer service (no need to clarify this)
2. lots of newbies (there are a lot of hardcore vets in the wcoff. decreases your chances of winning)
3. reputation (due to how the wcofb was run and how well the nfbc and nffc is run)
4. etc...

maybe your post says something about you? i'm not a shrink, so i don't know.

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 11:32 am

Originally posted by Greg Ambrosius:
On the draft bidding process, you are taking a stab at getting the draft position you want, but you're certainly not guaranteed of getting that spot even if you bid a lot on your desired spots. Since you're randomly getting placed in leagues that you don't know the other owners, it's possible that others also want that fifth spot or fourth spot or first spot that you desired. So in the end you may not get any of the draft spots you wanted.

In the proposed idea above, if you're able to get a top selection then you DEFINITELY will get the draft slot you wanted. Again, those who get bottom-tier selections may be drafting in spots they didn't want, but at least one portion of the randomness is eliminated. In the bidding process, new owners who either don't totally understand the process or don't want to spend very much on a draft slot really have no chance of getting a top-tiered spot, which I'm not sure is good for the contest. i guess this idea died? no one started a new thread? much like the 1RB/extra flex spot discussion, i'll reserve my comments until there is a strong push.