So, What Did You Finally Decide For Your KDS Preferences?

Glenneration X · Post by **Glenneration X** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 7:44 am

Originally posted by Gordon Gekko II:
quote:Originally posted by chase:
I think being at the 3 or 4 slot is awful this year. I feel bad for anyone who gets that (including me, if it's me!). chase - i'd have to disagree with you. the guy at 3 or 4 could luck into one of the big 2 runningbacks (if you are a fan of them) or they get their choice of top wr. always give me the choice. i don't want others dictating which player i get. as for some small advantage in the 2nd or 3rd rounds, insignificant in the whole scheme of the draft [/QUOTE]This was my thinking in choosing the top of the draft.....
I like the way Gekko thinks....

Glenn

ultimatefs · Post by **ultimatefs** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 8:31 am

10/13/14/11/12/1/2/3/4/9/8/7/6/5

10/11/12/3/2/1/9/8/7/6/5/4

Don't care what historical data is out there. This year is the only one that matters.

Ten gets the choice because all top 10's can be monsters, but each has a concern or two. With 3 rr, I want that earlier 3rd round pick as I like a lot of players right there and I can better dictate where my draft goes from there.

BLACKHAND · Post by **BLACKHAND** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 8:42 am

same here snake

Gordon Gekko II · Post by **Gordon Gekko II** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:00 am

fyi - for those of you "banking" on players being there because the "adp" report says so will likely be disappointed come draft day

Captain Hook · Post by **Captain Hook** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:03 am

Originally posted by Gordon Gekko II:
fyi - for those of you "banking" on players being there because the "adp" report says so will likely be disappointed come draft day GREAT posting Mark....and every year we see some guy at the back of the first round freak out because the player the based his "draft strategy" on was taken at 1.07. Preparedness is the key....you HAVE to be able to adjust throughout the draft

BLACKHAND · Post by **BLACKHAND** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:06 am

correct but that means a deangelo or a turner might drop. they cant have more than the top nine. i think this years draft will be all over the place.

Raiders · Post by **Raiders** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:08 am

Originally posted by Captain Hook:
quote:Originally posted by Gordon Gekko II:
fyi - for those of you "banking" on players being there because the "adp" report says so will likely be disappointed come draft day GREAT posting Mark....and every year we see some guy at the back of the first round freak out because the player the based his "draft strategy" on was taken at 1.07. Preparedness is the key....you HAVE to be able to adjust throughout the draft [/QUOTE]What and the top of the draft doesn't?

John

Old School · Post by **Old School** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:11 am

Originally posted by Gordon Gekko II:
fyi - for those of you "banking" on players being there because the "adp" report says so will likely be disappointed come draft day absolutely. those "early" sat. results included in ADP will cause some of your expected picks to be gone a few before your pick which can lead to extreme cursing......speaking from experience.

Gordon Gekko II · Post by **Gordon Gekko II** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:12 am

Originally posted by THE_BLACKHAND:
correct but that means a deangelo or a turner might drop. they cant have more than the top nine. i think this years draft will be all over the place. top 9? top 10? there's only 3 or 4 guys i want in the first round.

Old School · Post by **Old School** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:13 am

Originally posted by Gordon Gekko II:
quote:Originally posted by THE_BLACKHAND:
correct but that means a deangelo or a turner might drop. they cant have more than the top nine. i think this years draft will be all over the place. top 9? top 10? there's only 3 or 4 guys i want in the first round. [/QUOTE]Who are they Mark? :rolleyes: