Mid Season Experimental League forming

nnoy · Post by **nnoy** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 8:09 am

Who is keeping a head count?

nnoy · Post by **nnoy** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 8:13 am

(1) Dvy; (2) Gekko; (3) Brad Brown; (4) Walla Walla; (5) KW3; (6) nnoy; (7) JerseyPaul; (8) da bears; (9) UFS; (10) Vegas Gamblers; (11) Liquid Hippo

da bears · Post by **da bears** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 8:37 am

option A is cool with me by the way

Dyv · Post by **Dyv** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 9:38 am

I'll have a draft outlet figured out later tonight, hang with me as I research options. Conference call or web chat is possible... hang with me while I research.

I don't mind having 2 leagues if the interest is there to support it - we could do 1 A and 1 B if needed, but let's just fill up the thread and make decisions in 5-6 hours later tonight.

Need to get more feelings and names to make better decisions.

We WILL sort out A vs. B before draft positions are bid upon.

Keep the posts up, even if we exceed 14 owners. Anyone with interest should post here.

Thanks,

Dave

JerseyPaul · Post by **JerseyPaul** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 10:31 am

Perseonally, I think this is a great opportunity for 14 guys to try Option B and tell the group whether they think it's better or worse from a contest and enjoyment point of view. If we're going to be experimental, then let's experiment.

Walla Walla · Post by **Walla Walla** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 10:58 am

JerseyPaul, I agree. The chance to get some owners to try a new format without the fear of losing alot of money is a good deal. From what I've seen so far it would be a good group to poll at seasons end.

JB · Post by JB » Wed Sep 29, 2004 11:13 am

I'm in if it's Tuesday, Monday might be a problem. If we are going to experiment maybe we should add in the option of using a 2nd QB too!

Route Collectors · Post by **Route Collectors** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 11:24 am

I'm in. Put me down for option B.
Also like the conf call idea. With this group a computer crash would be lethal.

RC Chicago3

Walla Walla · Post by **Walla Walla** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 11:26 am

JB, adding a QB would be the same as having two RB. I think the idea of a true flex would answer the question.

Walla Walla · Post by **Walla Walla** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 11:30 am

This isn't a NFFC game so Tom and Greg could play
right? Bring it on cheeze heads!