2007 Draft Slots ~ presented by UFS

TradeStar28 · Post by **TradeStar28** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:57 pm

1 28 42 43 70
2 27 41 44 69
3 26 40 45 68
4 25 39 46 67
5 24 38 47 66
6 23 37 48 65
7 22 36 49 64
8 21 35 50 63
9 20 34 51 62
10 19 33 52 61
11 18 32 53 60
12 17 31 54 59
13 16 30 55 58
14 15 29 56 57

kjduke · Post by **kjduke** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:59 pm

Originally posted by FISHER:
1 28 42 43 70
2 27 41 44 69
3 26 40 45 68
4 25 39 46 67
5 24 38 47 66
6 23 37 48 65
7 22 36 49 64
8 21 35 50 63
9 20 34 51 62
10 19 33 52 61
11 18 32 53 60
12 17 31 54 59
13 16 30 55 58
14 15 29 56 57 Thanks Fisher, could you post the remaining 182 picks, I'm a newbie and I'm confused.

TradeStar28 · Post by **TradeStar28** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:07 pm

BillyWaz · Post by **BillyWaz** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:19 pm

I do like this idea to somewhat "level the playing field", but it DEFINITELY doesn't help the 6-8 (and maybe 5-9) picks a whole lot.

I think it actually hurts them, and they are now CLEARLY the least desired picks.

King of Queens · Post by **King of Queens** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:22 pm

Originally posted by BillyWaz:
I do like this idea to somewhat "level the playing field", but it DEFINITELY doesn't help the 6-8 (and maybe 5-9) picks a whole lot.

I think it actually hurts them, and they are now CLEARLY the least desired picks. There's an easy solution to that little problem. In Round 4, the order is set as

5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,10,11,12,13,14

Then Round 5 continues on the original plan of 14 to 1.

Problem solved!

kjduke · Post by **kjduke** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:57 pm

Originally posted by SNAKE:
...this debate will, after 46 pages, at the end simply provide more fodder for the likes of SNAKE and other pro-BBDS comrades to rather opt for BBDS out of sheer simplicity...carry on complicating, comrades...SNAKE My personal preference:
1) auction
2) BBDS with pts
3) BBDS with FAAB
4) KDS/3RR (KDS with 3rd rd reversal)

BBDS won't happen next season Snake, maybe not for a few yrs. This is an improvement. Jump on board.

kjduke · Post by **kjduke** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 3:00 pm

Originally posted by BillyWaz:
I do like this idea to somewhat "level the playing field", but it DEFINITELY doesn't help the 6-8 (and maybe 5-9) picks a whole lot.

I think it actually hurts them, and they are now CLEARLY the least desired picks. Waz, unfortunately it seems we gotta keep it simple for mass adoption ...

I think every slot outside the top 3 or 4 is better off since it dilutes the edge of those top slots and gives every team a better chance to keep up with the LT and LJ teams.

[ November 07, 2006, 09:02 PM: Message edited by: KJ Duke ]

TradeStar28 · Post by **TradeStar28** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 3:20 pm

In 2006, it was the top 3 (LT2, SA, LJ)

Now lets talk 2007....

Question 1) Is Shaun Alexander worthy of Top 3 pick next year even if he comes back slowly from his injury ?

Question 2) SJAX has shown recently that he is a protypical Fantasy type back who is a a triple threat (Runs, catches, scores TD's).... Are we gonna have the top 4 next year with him included ?

TradeStar28 · Post by **TradeStar28** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 3:53 pm

Pure #1 RB's who are almost guaranteed to remain for 2007 (Total: 16)

LT2
L. Johnson
Shaun Alexander
SJAX
Ronnie Brown
C. Portis
K. Jones
W. Parker
C. Taylor
B. Westbrook
R. Johnson
F. Gore
Edge (On the decline in Desert)
Caddy
W. McGahee
L. Jordan (Raiders a disgrace)

Aging Dinosaurs w/backups in the wings (Total: 5)

A. Green (Morency & Herron with neither being answer)
J. Lewis (Musa Smith)
F. Taylor (M. Jones-Drew & G Jones)
C. Dillon (L. Marooney)
W. Dunn (J. Norwood)

RBBC & Question Marks (Total: 11)

J. Jones & MBIII
R. Droughns (maybe J. Harrison or Draft pick)
W. Lundy & Gado (doubt it)
T. Henry & Lendale White
D. Foster & DeAngello Williams (dont drop him in FA!!!)
Deuce & Reggie Bush
Tatum Bell & Mike Bell
J. Addai & D. Rhodes
Thomas Jones & Cedric Benson
B. Jacobs (is he everydown back?)
K. Barlow & Leon Washington (Trade for Michael Turner)