Just for the record, Victory Points is not an FFPC exclusive.....they took the idea from Ant Sports. It is a good one, that would make the NFFC extreme high stakes leagues EVEN BETTER!

Honestly, if nothing changes next season I may shift my high stakes (non-main event) leagues over to the FFPC. The VP and deeper playoff format is simply more fair and more enjoyable. I've done two Diamond leagues here and thought I had a very solid playoff-worthy team both seasons, yet I'll be down $20k with no chance to even compete over the final 3 weeks. Don't think I will put myself thru that again with the same format.BillyWaz wrote:Agree 100% with the VP suggestion. Played in a Super a couple years ago, and myself and others lobbied to go from 6 teams to 4. Well, 4 is good......but giving those 2 others a shot would definitely make it more enjoyable.
Just for the record, Victory Points is not an FFPC exclusive.....they took the idea from Ant Sports. It is a good one, that would make the NFFC extreme high stakes leagues EVEN BETTER!
By the way, as the "real" sports leagues have evolved, they've realized the same thing ... adding wildcard teams helps interest in the game. Reward the top teams with an edge thru some kind of bye and/or point advantage, but give those on the bubble a shot to compete and you will have a better league. Highly restrictive playoffs might be good for the New York Yankee-type teams, but they're ultimately detrimental to league revenues.kjduke wrote:Just to add on to the above set-up. The argument against more playoff teams has always been that it doesn't do enough to reward the best teams. But with the wildcard elimination, the top 2 teams are guaranteed to remain in the playoffs which is ultimately still a 4-team race, and the top scoring teams have the additional edge of starting the playoff with a point edge.
It also opens up the race to the bottom tier of playoff teams who in many cases are in very tight races. It keeps more teams involved all season, so a few bad weeks because of injury doesn't eliminate you from contention -assuming you can re-build thru FAAB or get healthy.
kjduke wrote:Honestly, if nothing changes next season I may shift my high stakes (non-main event) leagues over to the FFPC. The VP and deeper playoff format is simply more fair and more enjoyable. I've done two Diamond leagues here and thought I had a very solid playoff-worthy team both seasons, yet I'll be down $20k with no chance to even compete over the final 3 weeks. Don't think I will put myself thru that again with the same format.BillyWaz wrote:Agree 100% with the VP suggestion. Played in a Super a couple years ago, and myself and others lobbied to go from 6 teams to 4. Well, 4 is good......but giving those 2 others a shot would definitely make it more enjoyable.
Just for the record, Victory Points is not an FFPC exclusive.....they took the idea from Ant Sports. It is a good one, that would make the NFFC extreme high stakes leagues EVEN BETTER!
kjduke wrote:Honestly, if nothing changes next season I may shift my high stakes (non-main event) leagues over to the FFPC. The VP and deeper playoff format is simply more fair and more enjoyable. I've done two Diamond leagues here and thought I had a very solid playoff-worthy team both seasons, yet I'll be down $20k with no chance to even compete over the final 3 weeks. Don't think I will put myself thru that again with the same format.BillyWaz wrote:Agree 100% with the VP suggestion. Played in a Super a couple years ago, and myself and others lobbied to go from 6 teams to 4. Well, 4 is good......but giving those 2 others a shot would definitely make it more enjoyable.
Just for the record, Victory Points is not an FFPC exclusive.....they took the idea from Ant Sports. It is a good one, that would make the NFFC extreme high stakes leagues EVEN BETTER!
GX, I agree and I am not trying to legislate away luck. I want to play in a league where the structure feels right:Glenneration X wrote:KJ, no format is perfect. I finished 3rd in overall points in the $5K Big Payback over in the FFPC, a league that utilizes both the Victory Points and 6 of 12 teams making the playoffs as you prefer and am on the outside looking in as well. Unfortunately, no matter how much we try, there's no way to completely legislate bad luck out of this hobby.
Precisely the example I was going to use. Sucks, and we can both relate.Glenneration X wrote:KJ, no format is perfect. I finished 3rd in overall points in the $5K Big Payback over in the FFPC, a league that utilizes both the Victory Points and 6 of 12 teams making the playoffs as you prefer and am on the outside looking in as well. Unfortunately, no matter how much we try, there's no way to completely legislate bad luck out of this hobby.
I wish we could please everyone in every format. As Billy said, the 14-team NFFC Supers did have 6 playoff teams at one time and THE OWNERS asked us to reduce the playoff teams to 4 teams. We did that. I don't remember any Diamond League owners asking for that 12-team playoff format to increase to 6 teams before or to have Victory Points. Hey, the Diamond League is a great group of owners and I think everyone would listen to any fair proposal before stating "I'm going to the competition if this isn't done." Heck, we're seeing in the NFBC where owners are gravitating immediately to the highest-dollar private leagues and then asking for improvements to make those leagues even better. I'm open to suggestions BEFORE the season to make any of these leagues fairer and in the case of the Super we did EXACTLY WHAT YOU WANTED.Glenneration X wrote:KJ, no format is perfect. I finished 3rd in overall points in the $5K Big Payback over in the FFPC, a league that utilizes both the Victory Points and 6 of 12 teams making the playoffs as you prefer and am on the outside looking in as well. Unfortunately, no matter how much we try, there's no way to completely legislate bad luck out of this hobby.