Re: Week 8 Thoughts and Observations
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 2:44 pm
Vick may have a hard time. I understand that KC is bringing in some specialized talent just for this game...
NFFC Message Boards
https://nffcforums.shgn.com/
Ahhh...To re-live that Tebow thread. A guy that was receiving such high praise when the stars perfectly aligned. Where is that guy now? Not putting up meaningful fantasy stats, I know that! I love statistics but too many people focus on small sample size and expect that to continue. Stats can be tweaked to prove almost any point and sometimes it's just the eye test that tells the real story. The Tebow brand of football was just not sustainable in this league. You HAVE to be able to throw the ball in today's NFL.Sandman62 wrote:I agree. I wasn't trying to endorse either. I was simply pointing out how similar in production he is to a player that was being highly touted a few short years ago. Why no such love for Tannehill? [Because he isn't a media rock star?]
You might need these this week - http://www.cooks.com/rec/search/0,1-0,crow,FF.htmlTom Kessenich wrote:He's painful to watch. Just not all good. Never understood all the hype about him.TR wrote:Is there a QB who gets more passes batted down than Tannehill?
Damn! I underestimated the mighty Tannehill!Sandman62 wrote:I'd start Tannehill still in a home game with his team favored by 2 over Vick on the road @KC -9.5 underdogs.
Though the Jets will likely be playing from behind, that alone doesn't mean they'll be productive in slop time; they may just continue being sloppy.
Tannehill is at home vs. SD, who is 6th in pass D, with 232 YPG and 14 TDs in 8 games
• QBs vs. SD (on road): Palmer: 304/2, Manuel: 238/1, Carr: 282/4, PManning: 286/3 = 277/2.5 per game
• Tannehill @home (NE, KC, GB): passing: 209/1.7, rushing: -2, 9 and 48 yds, 0 TDs
• Line: MIA -2, 44 O/U = 23-21
• Tannehill Projection: passing: 240/2, rushing: 30 yds = 27 NFFC pts
Vick is @KC, who is #1 vs. the pass, with 215 YPG and 12 TDs in 7 games (and 0 rushing TDs)
• QBs @KC: Locker: 266/2, Brady: 159/1, Davis: 160/1 = 195/1.3 per game
• Line: KC -9.5, 41.5 = 26-16
• In 7 of 8 games so far, the Jets have scored 17-25 points, despite how horrible they've looked. But the Chiefs D will be a big challenge to overcome and I strongly suspect a long, long day for Mr. Vick (= multiple picks/fumbles).
• Vick Projection: passing: 150/1, rushing: 50 yds = 18.5 NFFC pts
Nah...Tannehill is still a turd....he faced crappy chargers defense missing 1 of their top corners verrett...and having to both travel cross country and play early game...no surprise rivers would crap the bed in game like this either, enabling tannehill to play read option with no pressure. Watch and see what happens when tannehill faces a real defense next week and forced to throw...bald is beautiful wrote:You might need these this week - http://www.cooks.com/rec/search/0,1-0,crow,FF.htmlTom Kessenich wrote:He's painful to watch. Just not all good. Never understood all the hype about him.TR wrote:Is there a QB who gets more passes batted down than Tannehill?
No is isn't. Weeden is a turd. Geno Smith is a turd. Tannehill is a QB2, a guy you play during bye weeks or if he has a good matchup. Today was a good matchup. Just like I said last week, if he is going to run for 40-50 yards a week, his value is pretty decent.TR wrote: Nah...Tannehill is still a turd....he faced crappy chargers defense missing 1 of their top corners verrett...and having to both travel cross country and play early game...no surprise rivers would crap the bed in game like this either, enabling tannehill to play read option with no pressure. Watch and see what happens when tannehill faces a real defense next week and forced to throw...
I agree tannehill is a QB2...I meant he's a turd real life QB...bald is beautiful wrote:No is isn't. Weeden is a turd. Geno Smith is a turd. Tannehill is a QB2, a guy you play during bye weeks or if he has a good matchup. Today was a good matchup. Just like I said last week, if he is going to run for 40-50 yards a week, his value is pretty decent.TR wrote: Nah...Tannehill is still a turd....he faced crappy chargers defense missing 1 of their top corners verrett...and having to both travel cross country and play early game...no surprise rivers would crap the bed in game like this either, enabling tannehill to play read option with no pressure. Watch and see what happens when tannehill faces a real defense next week and forced to throw...