Logjam at WR3

Captain Hook
Posts: 1557
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 6:00 pm

Logjam at WR3

Post by Captain Hook » Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:21 am

Originally posted by SNAKE:
...SNAKE's performance in the NFFC to date as a sole owner:

2005: #17 overall (top 6%)
2006: # 314 overall (bottom 3%)
...SNAKE Slithery one - can we get a review of snakemath here or is #17 for weeks 1-13? It certainly isn't for the Championship round when Snake was indeed in the finals, but was 29th overall!

BillyWaz
Posts: 10912
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 6:00 pm

Logjam at WR3

Post by BillyWaz » Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:28 am

Originally posted by Captain Hook:
quote:Originally posted by SNAKE:
...SNAKE's performance in the NFFC to date as a sole owner:

2005: #17 overall (top 6%)
2006: # 314 overall (bottom 3%)
...SNAKE Slithery one - can we get a review of snakemath here or is #17 for weeks 1-13? It certainly isn't for the Championship round when Snake was indeed in the finals, but was 29th overall!
[/QUOTE]:D :eek: :D :eek:

User avatar
Diesel
Posts: 5887
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 6:00 pm

Logjam at WR3

Post by Diesel » Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:24 pm

I've stated in the past that Branch is not as good as he's been said to be. A QB like Brady/Manning/Palmer can make a WR look MUCH better than what we really is. I'll give you an example: RECHE CALDWELL. Go ahead and draft him like the #3 WR he's going to be because Brady liked him a lot last year. In fact, take J. Gaffney too while you're at it...lol

Branch will have 2-4 great games. He will also get hurt 2-6 games. AND he will also be below average for aprroximately 9 games.

D.J. Hackett is going to have very good NFFC numbers, Don't go taking him instead of Wayne, but expect Hackett to end up with 67 catches, 900 yards and 8 - 9 TD's. Some of you are great at saving things. Feel free to copy this and re-post it at the end of the year to congratulate me or to bust my chops.

Marc
*Ranked #1 Average Fantasy Football Player in the Nation 2004-2013

"Fantasy sports are all about LUCK. Except when I win."

Post Reply