week 10 sit/start
- Tom Kessenich
- Posts: 30094
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 6:00 pm
week 10 sit/start
Sorry, the Packers are not available in my league or likely any other one.
So far the call is the Jags without question. Anyone else want to steer me toward victory?
So far the call is the Jags without question. Anyone else want to steer me toward victory?
Tom Kessenich
Manager of High Stakes Fantasy Games, SportsHub Technologies
Twitter - @TomKessenich
Manager of High Stakes Fantasy Games, SportsHub Technologies
Twitter - @TomKessenich
week 10 sit/start
Hells Satans, D.Moore.
Mattjb, I say Sanchez because the Pats defense is HORRIBLE. But Romo seems to prove me wrong constantly. Good luck.
Tom K...My vote is for the Vikings. Just because you even listed them. LOL. I don't know why you listed them because you would hate starting them this week for so many different reasons. Vikes!
Mattjb, I say Sanchez because the Pats defense is HORRIBLE. But Romo seems to prove me wrong constantly. Good luck.
Tom K...My vote is for the Vikings. Just because you even listed them. LOL. I don't know why you listed them because you would hate starting them this week for so many different reasons. Vikes!
*Ranked #1 Average Fantasy Football Player in the Nation 2004-2013
"Fantasy sports are all about LUCK. Except when I win."
"Fantasy sports are all about LUCK. Except when I win."
- Tom Kessenich
- Posts: 30094
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 6:00 pm
week 10 sit/start
Originally posted by Diesel:
Tom K...My vote is for the Vikings. Just because you even listed them. LOL. I don't know why you listed them because you would hate starting them this week for so many different reasons. Vikes! I listed them only because they're available. If I thought they had a snowball's chance against the Packers at Lambeau I'd definitely consider them. But I don't.
Tom K...My vote is for the Vikings. Just because you even listed them. LOL. I don't know why you listed them because you would hate starting them this week for so many different reasons. Vikes! I listed them only because they're available. If I thought they had a snowball's chance against the Packers at Lambeau I'd definitely consider them. But I don't.
Tom Kessenich
Manager of High Stakes Fantasy Games, SportsHub Technologies
Twitter - @TomKessenich
Manager of High Stakes Fantasy Games, SportsHub Technologies
Twitter - @TomKessenich
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 6:00 pm
week 10 sit/start
My vote is for the Minnesota Vikings. Because I'm silly like that.
Thank you. Tip your waitresses. Take care, comb your hair and wear clean underwear.
Thank you. Tip your waitresses. Take care, comb your hair and wear clean underwear.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
-
- Posts: 1084
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 6:00 pm
week 10 sit/start
Originally posted by Tom Kessenich:
quote:Originally posted by Diesel:
Tom K...My vote is for the Vikings. Just because you even listed them. LOL. I don't know why you listed them because you would hate starting them this week for so many different reasons. Vikes! I listed them only because they're available. If I thought they had a snowball's chance against the Packers at Lambeau I'd definitely consider them. But I don't. [/QUOTE]My NINERS defense first choice, then JAGS
..and u dont hate Jacoby Ford. U hate his foot
quote:Originally posted by Diesel:
Tom K...My vote is for the Vikings. Just because you even listed them. LOL. I don't know why you listed them because you would hate starting them this week for so many different reasons. Vikes! I listed them only because they're available. If I thought they had a snowball's chance against the Packers at Lambeau I'd definitely consider them. But I don't. [/QUOTE]My NINERS defense first choice, then JAGS
..and u dont hate Jacoby Ford. U hate his foot
week 10 sit/start
Flex - Ogbonnaya or M jenkins?
week 10 sit/start
I know I've already asked but I keep going back and forth on this one. Open to more opinions.
Jonathan Stewart or Laurent Robinson at flex this week?
Jonathan Stewart or Laurent Robinson at flex this week?
week 10 sit/start
Tom, Jags all the way. As for the Rams @Browns, as woeful as my Browns are again this year, don't forget where their HC was coaching last year. I wouldn't play the Rams.
[ November 12, 2011, 08:32 AM: Message edited by: Sandman62 ]
[ November 12, 2011, 08:32 AM: Message edited by: Sandman62 ]
week 10 sit/start
What do folks think of Austin Pettis this week? With Lloyd being blanketed by Haden and Alexander out, could Pettis see a lot of action over the middle?
In our Classic (which we're pretty much out of, but not going down without a fight!), we currently have RB2/flex of Lynch vs BAL and Jacobs @SF, WR2&3 of Gaffney @MIA and Nelson @ DAL.
Thinking of sliding Pettis in for Lynch. Lynch has not been good this year vs good Ds and is probably looking at another crappy 75 yard day. Thoughts?
Other options: Hill @IND (he's scored in 3 of last 4) or Knox vs DET. Hmm... As I said, we're pretty much out of this league. So if we have ANY hope, it'll have to be by points. So we should probably aim for upside. Wouldn't that be TD-hound Hill then over PPR guy Pettis?
[ November 12, 2011, 09:07 AM: Message edited by: Sandman62 ]
In our Classic (which we're pretty much out of, but not going down without a fight!), we currently have RB2/flex of Lynch vs BAL and Jacobs @SF, WR2&3 of Gaffney @MIA and Nelson @ DAL.
Thinking of sliding Pettis in for Lynch. Lynch has not been good this year vs good Ds and is probably looking at another crappy 75 yard day. Thoughts?
Other options: Hill @IND (he's scored in 3 of last 4) or Knox vs DET. Hmm... As I said, we're pretty much out of this league. So if we have ANY hope, it'll have to be by points. So we should probably aim for upside. Wouldn't that be TD-hound Hill then over PPR guy Pettis?
[ November 12, 2011, 09:07 AM: Message edited by: Sandman62 ]
week 10 sit/start
prob go hill mike. but in this crazy year jacobs vs 49ers which has not let up a rushing td this year looks like a bad play so id use jacobs in a year matchups mean so little.
THIS IS THE BUSINESS WE HAVE CHOSEN