WCOFF FAAB SNAFU

sportsbettingman · Post by **sportsbettingman** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:14 pm

If I were the one writing the title to this...and the roles were reversed...it would be more like...

Stats Inc FAAB SNAFU.

~Lance

TradeStar28 · Post by **TradeStar28** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:42 pm

Originally posted by sportsbettingman:
If I were the one writing the title to this...and the roles were reversed...it would be more like...

Stats Inc FAAB SNAFU.

~Lance Why ?

King of Queens · Post by **King of Queens** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 5:04 pm

Originally posted by sportsbettingman:
If I were the one writing the title to this...and the roles were reversed...it would be more like...

Stats Inc FAAB SNAFU.

~Lance If Greg and Tom handled the situation as poorly as Lenny and Emil did, the title of the thread SHOULD be "NFFC FAAB SNAFU".

There are an awful lot of long-time customers that are mighty upset right now -- and it's mostly at the ill-reasoned solution and lack of responsiveness.

sportsbettingman · Post by **sportsbettingman** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 5:19 pm

Sorry...the title to this thread was written by gossip central at 5:50am pst.

I doubt the solution could have been hammered out that fast.

You do realize the legalities involved?

~Lance

sportsbettingman · Post by **sportsbettingman** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 5:21 pm

Originally posted by King of Queens:
quote:Originally posted by sportsbettingman:
If I were the one writing the title to this...and the roles were reversed...it would be more like...

Stats Inc FAAB SNAFU.

~Lance If Greg and Tom handled the situation as poorly as Lenny and Emil did, the title of the thread SHOULD be "NFFC FAAB SNAFU".

There are an awful lot of long-time customers that are mighty upset right now -- and it's mostly at the ill-reasoned solution and lack of responsiveness. [/QUOTE]If the bids were revoked and reset...and all those that bid could not re-bid in time...I'll bet you all you have that there would be more "long time customers" mighty more upset right now...it's called damage control.

~Lance

dcc1973 · Post by **dcc1973** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 5:22 pm

Lance - I find it just as appaling that I have to come to an NFFC message board to comment on the WCOFF SNAFU today, as this is the only place where I think my post won't be deleted by the message board administrators.

King of Queens · Post by **King of Queens** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 5:24 pm

Originally posted by sportsbettingman:
I doubt the solution could have been hammered out that fast.

You do realize the legalities involved?Lenny's "Explanation" mentioned nothing about legalities. I doubt they even consulted an attorney before reaching their decision.

sportsbettingman · Post by **sportsbettingman** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 5:24 pm

The main vault in your logic is assuming that every WCOFF player had the opportunity to adjust his original bid in the last 12 hours.

If this happened in week 2 thru 7 or so...WOW...big mess...it's big enough as is...we should all learn from it.

~Lance

sportsbettingman · Post by **sportsbettingman** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 5:26 pm

Originally posted by King of Queens:
quote:Originally posted by sportsbettingman:
I doubt the solution could have been hammered out that fast.

You do realize the legalities involved?Lenny's "Explanation" mentioned nothing about legalities. I doubt they even consulted an attorney before reaching their decision. [/QUOTE]If you are so foolish as to think this...I'm sorry.

~Lance

King of Queens · Post by **King of Queens** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 5:27 pm

Originally posted by David Comings:
Lance - I find it just as appaling that I have to come to an NFFC message board to comment on the WCOFF SNAFU today, as this is the only place where I think my post won't be deleted by the message board administrators. "All the responses are gone because the only response that matters is mine."

Remember that one? That was Lenny's response to why he removed all the posts regarding the server crash a few weeks back.

Like we're really going to forget about this one.