NFFC Message Boards

greg
i think we need to jump on this wcoff problem that they have with customer sevice let's just listen
to some of the guys that play in both leagues
1. they pay 1600.00 to have a 1 in 11 odds to win 6000.00 of league money then it is harder to win the 200,000 because they have more people in their event but the entry fee is only 450.00 more than ours
the 12 team league is easier to win the 6000.00 also most people are use to playing in 12 team leagues or smaller leagues
bottom line i don't think the entry fee is the issue here it gets down to 450.00 more
to win 6000.00 in a 12 team league and then go for 200,000 vs saving the 450.00 to win 5000.00 and then going after 100,000 but with better odds besuse of less people
i love playing in this event i have been
doing this since 1989,greg you and tom run a great show here but i would like to see this event grow
lets face it wcoff don't treatthier people very good from what i read on this board and they are not happy with xpertsports.com
what do you think greg
gerard sambola

Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:
quote:Originally posted by D-Day Heroes:
... Greg , since total season participation is a concern ( and rightly so ), can not a small amount ( 100 $ a week ) 1300 $ of the pool for each division, pay-out for that weeks winner in points...? no one cares about $100 [/QUOTE]Agreed.

I agree with more money for the teams that had great seasons.I finish 16th overall and get 500, the team that finihes 33rd gets 5000.00, because of wins.IM sure there are other teams that won 5000.00 even lower than 33.I now know how snake feels, but with the wild card rule , that helps, at least im in the big show.

Same here, Eddie as I finished 3rd in the league and #27 overall while the league champ finished 90th. I think 3rd place should at least get their money back.

And Billy, I had the "2nd" best team in Chicago 2 and will prove to have been the best had it not been for injuries to Stallworth and Colston that caused me to take 3 "0"'s.

Originally posted by Tamuscarecrow:
Same here, Eddie as I finished 3rd in the league and #27 overall while the league champ finished 90th. I think 3rd place should at least get their money back.

And Billy, I had the "2nd" best team in Chicago 2 and will prove to have been the best had it not been for injuries to Stallworth and Colston that caused me to take 3 "0"'s. I put "best" in quotes because I was being sarcastic, and was ranking "best" by $$$ won.

As far as you using injuries....I am afraid hanging out with Snake is rubbing off on you Rick! You couldn't honestly expect Stallworth to play a whole season (he is a wuss), and there is NOTHING you can do when a player gets injured early in a game (Colston- just shitty luck!)

We ALL have left points on the bench this year in one form or another, but injuries are part of the game, and you deal with them.

All that being said, I should have won Chicago 2 (needed just one more win!), and you should have cashed the $2,500.

You did get a raw deal on that.

[ December 10, 2006, 10:26 AM: Message edited by: BillyWaz ]

Originally posted by Eddiejag:
I agree with more money for the teams that had great seasons.I finish 16th overall and get 500, the team that finihes 33rd gets 5000.00, because of wins.IM sure there are other teams that won 5000.00 even lower than 33.I now know how snake feels, but with the wild card rule , that helps, at least im in the big show. Eddie,

This was the lowest point scoring team coming into the championship round;

101. Greenwich St. Tavern NFFC New York League 1 11-2-0 1615.15 6 Christopher Vaccaro

No question that you deserve to be in the Championship Round, and best of luck to you!

[ December 10, 2006, 10:35 AM: Message edited by: BillyWaz ]

Geek , # 1, its a not a week. Do the math, if you win 3 weeks thats 300$, 4 weeks = 400$, 5 weeks = 500$, comprende..? # 2 , if thats still not enough, then double it, because I can't think of a better way to keep everyone involved from start to finish, can you..?

Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:
quote:Originally posted by D-Day Heroes:
... Greg , since total season participation is a concern ( and rightly so ), can not a small amount ( 100 $ a week ) 1300 $ of the pool for each division, pay-out for that weeks winner in points...? no one cares about $100 [/QUOTE]SO, make the obvious change and instead of $100 per week in each league, take the $100 from EACH league and give it to the highest scorer in the field - if you have 22 leagues, people will be very interested and pay attention for $2200 each week and it really makes the MNF games FUN!

... Thats a great suggestion , Hook..!

Originally posted by Captain Hook:
people will be very interested and pay attention for $2200 each week and it really makes the MNF games FUN! Almost as interesting as playing for an 8x10 autographed glossy of Andrew Walter.