** OFFICIAL ABC THREAD **

TamuScarecrow · Post by **TamuScarecrow** » Tue Sep 06, 2005 4:40 pm

GG, let's see, looking at your starting lineup, you've got some work to do on the waiver wire again. Barlow as your #2 rb, Parker as your #3 wr, and McCareins as your flex, lots of question marks on this team.

King of Queens · Post by **King of Queens** » Tue Sep 06, 2005 5:46 pm

Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:
quote:Originally posted by King of Queens:
Also remember that last season was an INCREDIBLE season for the KC rushing attack -- one of the best in fantasy football history from a collective backfield. To expect that again would be like Manning's owners to anticipate another 50 TDs. Sure, it could happen, but is it LIKELY? The jury is out.... check your stats again...KC RB stats for the last three years (minus fumbles and 2pt conversions)...
2002 505 pts
2003 500 pts
2004 542 pts

comments, KoQ? [/QUOTE]An impressive run, but like KobeShaq, all good things must come to an end eventually.

The biggest problem with this analysis is that only one player produced big time each week for the Chiefs last year. You are counting on BOTH to have big weeks, but only on certain weeks? I'd say a typical distribution of points would be something along the lines of 20/10, 25/5, 10/5, 15/15, 35/0, etc. If you can call it correctly for 16 weeks, or even 13 out of 16 weeks, you'll have made a true believer out of me. Hell, I'll even join the minions.

I'll be interested to see if you make the same choice in Gekko II on Wednesday night -- looks like you'll have an opportunity to draft Holmes at #5 again.

TradeStar28 · Post by **TradeStar28** » Tue Sep 06, 2005 5:52 pm

Originally posted by TamuScarecrow:
GG, let's see, looking at your starting lineup, you've got some work to do on the waiver wire again. Barlow as your #2 rb, Parker as your #3 wr, and McCareins as your flex, lots of question marks on this team. Tamu-

GG is done this year...he knows, i know it, we all know it....he is gonna pull a Schussman 2003, first to worst

more importantly, I wonder what AB is gonna have for breakfast tomorrow .

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Tue Sep 06, 2005 10:59 pm

Originally posted by FI$HER:
GG is done this year...he knows, i know it, we all know it....he is gonna pull a Schussman 2003, first to worst that's ok. i'll still have props over the likes of you and you're 8th place finish in your league last year

here's fisher after his draft last year

here he is at the mid-way point of the season

and again at the end of the season

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Tue Sep 06, 2005 11:00 pm

Originally posted by TamuScarecrow:
lots of question marks on this team. that's the way i like it

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Tue Sep 06, 2005 11:04 pm

Originally posted by TamuScarecrow:
GG, let's see, looking at your starting lineup, you've got some work to do on the waiver wire again. Barlow as your #2 rb, Parker as your #3 wr, and McCareins as your flex, lots of question marks on this team. i was gonna go with northcutt at the flex. he'll score more than a.bryant

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Tue Sep 06, 2005 11:06 pm

Originally posted by King of Queens:
I'll be interested to see if you make the same choice in Gekko II on Wednesday night -- looks like you'll have an opportunity to draft Holmes at #5 again. watch and learn

TamuScarecrow · Post by **TamuScarecrow** » Wed Sep 07, 2005 4:29 am

i was gonna go with northcutt at the flex. he'll score more than a.bryant I believe you would too, but to count out AB is a mistake that many cannot make up for as in most leagues he was drafted.

3INTBOY · Post by **3INTBOY** » Wed Sep 07, 2005 6:46 am

Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:
quote:Originally posted by FI$HER:
GG is done this year...he knows, i know it, we all know it....he is gonna pull a Schussman 2003, first to worst that's ok. i'll still have props over the likes of you and you're 8th place finish in your league last year

here's fisher after his draft last year

here he is at the mid-way point of the season

and again at the end of the season

[/QUOTE]GG:

You made me laugh out loud w/ this one.

I like Fi$$ures' team. But Fi$$ure is convinced he has built a monster. Paper Tigers we are until the games get played...........

3'

3INTBOY · Post by **3INTBOY** » Wed Sep 07, 2005 6:58 am

Originally posted by TamuScarecrow:
quote:like i told king of queens offline. KC running game last year...
holmes 205.4pts
l.j. 162.9pts
blaylock 144.8pts
total = 513This is the equivalent of Snake taking Horn and Stallworth, you could have taken care of your wr problems if you had taken a star rb instead of the two-headed hydra you call the KC running game. We'll get a good gauge on this Week 1 against a Jets D that is supposed to be so good. [/QUOTE]Sorry man but....
Blaylock doesn't play here anymore:
Add 60% of Blaylock to Priest 205.4+86.88= 292.28
Add 40% to LJ 162.9+57.92=220.80

I do plan to start them both after getting a look at Willie Parker and the carries break down.

If you would like to take away 10% from each, just because you don't expect so many points from the KC backfield. Be my guest and you still get:
263 from Priest making Priest a Top 10 NFFC Back
200 from LJ Making LJ a Top 20 Back

Add it up any way you would like:

It comes out nice.

3'