Who wins 1st place?

ultimatefs · Post by **ultimatefs** » Thu Nov 10, 2005 9:46 am

Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:
If S.Vines keeps posting 19.9, I can get back up there if Mcgahee, Dunn, C.martin step it up a notch. vines sucks [/QB][/quote]

Vines beat you last week.

I would have taken McGahee #4. I would have never taken Holmes. Not even with a handcuff at #7.

What sucks is having to take C.mart when L.Jordan and T.Barber go right before you. I really wanted McGahee/Jordan bad with my #7 pick.

I see I'm 6-3 vs whatever your team name is, whatever your owner name is, this week on the breakdown. Keep smack'n.

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Thu Nov 10, 2005 9:48 am

Originally posted by UFS:
I see I'm 6-3 vs whatever your team name is, whatever your owner name is, this week on the breakdown. Keep smack'n. you're 4th in your league in points (and almost 6th), and your top 8 draft day selections have been healthy all year. you have no excuse for not performing better, other than a bad draft.

1 Willis McGahee RB
2 Curtis Martin RB
3 Warrick Dunn RB
4 Jason Witten TE
5 Donald Driver WR
6 Deion Branch WR
7 Jake Delhomme QB
8 Buffalo Bills DST

[ November 10, 2005, 03:49 PM: Message edited by: Gordon Gekko ]

ultimatefs · Post by **ultimatefs** » Thu Nov 10, 2005 10:10 am

Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:
quote:Originally posted by UFS:
I see I'm 6-3 vs whatever your team name is, whatever your owner name is, this week on the breakdown. Keep smack'n. you're 4th in your league in points (and almost 6th), and your top 8 draft day selections have been healthy all year. you have no excuse for not performing better, other than a bad draft.

1 Willis McGahee RB
2 Curtis Martin RB
3 Warrick Dunn RB
4 Jason Witten TE
5 Donald Driver WR
6 Deion Branch WR
7 Jake Delhomme QB
8 Buffalo Bills DST [/QUOTE]Doesn't look like a bad draft to me.

FallGuys have a career year out of J.Galloway.
MeatLoaf team took L.Jordan, Indy D, and N.rakers (last pick)

There guys have simply done better. God bless 'em.

This is a bad draft IMO.
1 5 Priest Holmes RB
2 10 Torry Holt WR
3 5 Kevan Barlow RB
4 10 Larry Johnson RB
5 5 Drew Bennett WR
6 10 Willie Parker RB
7 5 Randy McMichael TE
8 10 Aaron Brooks QB
9 5 Justin McCareins WR
10 10 Ronald Curry WR

Only picks 2,4,5 and 7 were on my radar then.

Easy to see why you are 3-6, a result predicted by many.

Did you get to spend any of the $35K?, or did wifey spend it all?

If wifey spent it all, that would explain a lot.

[ November 10, 2005, 04:11 PM: Message edited by: UFS ]

Bezoar · Post by **Bezoar** » Thu Nov 10, 2005 10:38 am

Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:
quote:Originally posted by Vega$ Gambler$:
WRONG!!! next... Record of Team #24 overall = 4-5
Points scored by Team #24 = 1228

Record of Team #273 overall = 4-5
Points scored by Team #273 = 857

In summary, Team #24 has scored 371 more points than Team #273 (that’s an average of 41 more points per WEEK), but they have the same dumpy record. This example is simply an abomination made possible by H2H scheduling.

thanks for playing [/QUOTE]I think that the only rationale response to this is:

1) The square root of 9 is three
2) C**2 + B**2 = A**2

The natural laws are what the natural laws are!

Anything else you need here GG?

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Thu Nov 10, 2005 12:04 pm

Originally posted by UFS:
Doesn't look like a bad draft to me.you can tell it to the other blokes in the toilet bowl

Originally posted by UFS:
This is a bad draft IMO.
1 5 Priest Holmes RB
2 10 Torry Holt WR
3 5 Kevan Barlow RB
4 10 Larry Johnson RB
5 5 Drew Bennett WR
6 10 Willie Parker RB
7 5 Randy McMichael TE
8 10 Aaron Brooks QB
9 5 Justin McCareins WR
10 10 Ronald Curry WR

Only picks 2,4,5 and 7 were on my radar then.

Easy to see why you are 3-6, a result predicted by many. funny john...after our draft YOU said my team was in the top 3 in the league according to the application you were running on your laptop. in fact YOU said the top 3 in our league was me, you and rob. let's not tell lies john. FULL DISCLOSURE. tell the truth. you can do it. thanks.

Originally posted by UFS:
Did you get to spend any of the $35K?, or did wifey spend it all? since you brought up money...not trying to put you down, but i probably made more in one year than you'll make in your entire "gamer" career.

i sense some hositility in your posts john. toilet bowl two years in a row might do it to some folks. don't let it happen to you

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Thu Nov 10, 2005 12:05 pm

Originally posted by Bezoar:
I think that the only rationale response to this is:

1) The square root of 9 is three
2) C**2 + B**2 = A**2

The natural laws are what the natural laws are!

Anything else you need here GG? natural laws?!? next!

ultimatefs · Post by **ultimatefs** » Thu Nov 10, 2005 1:00 pm

Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:
quote:Originally posted by UFS:
Did you get to spend any of the $35K?, or did wifey spend it all? since you brought up money...not trying to put you down, but i probably made more in one year than you'll make in your entire "gamer" career.

i sense some hositility in your posts john. toilet bowl two years in a row might do it to some folks. don't let it happen to you [/QUOTE]I've made way more than $35k. That's pretty funny.

I play all four sports though. I also was playing when you were in diapers.

And that's just playing.

The "Industry" has netted me twice what your goal is, and in January that number becomes 5 times ten years from now.

Hostility? LOL.

As always, your posts have more meaning by what you do not respond to, rather than what you do respond to.

I think this week, you should change your team name again to Nit Pik. The nag thing is boring.

dgamblnman · Post by **dgamblnman** » Thu Nov 10, 2005 2:19 pm

Did anyone happen to notice that GG never replied to my post except to place a picture of himself???

lol

Sometimes logic is just wasted....

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Thu Nov 10, 2005 3:41 pm

Originally posted by UFS:
I've made way more than $35k. sure you did john...

[ November 10, 2005, 09:42 PM: Message edited by: Gordon Gekko ]

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Thu Nov 10, 2005 3:46 pm

Originally posted by Vega$ Gambler$:
Did anyone happen to notice that GG never replied to my post except to place a picture of himself??? phil - here's a good signature for your moniker

[ November 10, 2005, 09:46 PM: Message edited by: Gordon Gekko ]