Originally posted by renman:
Though I am completely receptive to the idea of bidding for draft posts once the event is sold out for entries and we know that new concept wont slow interest in the event from new owners... i do have a question...
what is the DOWN SIDE to Gregs derby style of picking draft order? I have seen many experienced NFFC owners say they prefer the bidding idea over the derby idea. I am wondering what the down side is to the derby idea. and if you had to choose between the current random draft picking and the derby draft picking and the bidding option was not an option, what would you choose and why?
i see the derby idea as hugely more interesting and fair then the random "you get where you are picked" currently system. I agree that the derby idea would be better than random.
However, if I give the current random selection a "1", the derby would be like a "3" (maybe?), and the bidding is a "9.9".
The derby idea just isn't a big enough inprovement to make the change IMO.
It is like if a woman is going to have a boob job, HAVE the boob job! Don't just increase them a little, go for the Dolly Parton look alikes!
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)