NFFC League Playoffs 2012
NFFC League Playoffs 2012
I would like to see 1 full point for running backs catching passes.I can live with 6 or 4 for qb's no big deal just adapt.I would like to see atleast 4 teams make playoffs in the primetime and Classic.The weekly prizes was pretty cool .LIKE the 2 points for interception or fumble.
NFBC (NY) auction league champion!
Bad(ass)Angels
He who steps to me in 2005, you better realize you dont have enough jive..... TURKEY!
Bad(ass)Angels
He who steps to me in 2005, you better realize you dont have enough jive..... TURKEY!
NFFC League Playoffs 2012
I'd prefer to have the same scoring and same playoff format for all main events.
The classic remains the more difficult contest to win with the two extra teams and the shallower player pool, but I don't think it needs to be complicated with different scoring or playoffs. (Unless of course you want to go the Victory Pts route for the classic).
The classic remains the more difficult contest to win with the two extra teams and the shallower player pool, but I don't think it needs to be complicated with different scoring or playoffs. (Unless of course you want to go the Victory Pts route for the classic).
NFFC League Playoffs 2012
Originally posted by KJ Duke:
I'd prefer to have the same scoring and same playoff format for all main events.
The classic remains the more difficult contest to win with the two extra teams and the shallower player pool, but I don't think it needs to be complicated with different scoring or playoffs. (Unless of course you want to go the Victory Pts route for the classic). I agree that the classic is more difficult because of the number of teams in each league. I think the NFFC sets itself apart by offering options for everyone. If everything is the same, then the players that play as many teams as possible in each main event format strengthen their advantage over those that can only afford to play one format or one that they feel they're better at.
Not sure that makes sense, but why not give people a choice as to the format they choose to play for big bucks. Hard enough going against the elite by making it easier for them by only having to prepare for one format.
Probably not popular with the "Chum chum club" but I think the NFFC has it spot on with multiple formats so that everyone can make their own choices.
I'd prefer to have the same scoring and same playoff format for all main events.
The classic remains the more difficult contest to win with the two extra teams and the shallower player pool, but I don't think it needs to be complicated with different scoring or playoffs. (Unless of course you want to go the Victory Pts route for the classic).
I agree that the classic is more difficult because of the number of teams in each league. I think the NFFC sets itself apart by offering options for everyone. If everything is the same, then the players that play as many teams as possible in each main event format strengthen their advantage over those that can only afford to play one format or one that they feel they're better at.Not sure that makes sense, but why not give people a choice as to the format they choose to play for big bucks. Hard enough going against the elite by making it easier for them by only having to prepare for one format.
Probably not popular with the "Chum chum club" but I think the NFFC has it spot on with multiple formats so that everyone can make their own choices.
Joe
NFFC League Playoffs 2012
Going back to the beginning, where this thread began, can we stick with 4 teams and not 6 teams in the playoffs for primetime? This is a 12 team league. Lets keep the playoffs for the best teams, not half the league.
-
CoMoHusker
- Posts: 491
- Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 6:00 pm
NFFC League Playoffs 2012
Originally posted by Money:
quote:Originally posted by KJ Duke:
I'd prefer to have the same scoring and same playoff format for all main events.
The classic remains the more difficult contest to win with the two extra teams and the shallower player pool, but I don't think it needs to be complicated with different scoring or playoffs. (Unless of course you want to go the Victory Pts route for the classic). I agree that the classic is more difficult because of the number of teams in each league. I think the NFFC sets itself apart by offering options for everyone. If everything is the same, then the players that play as many teams as possible in each main event format strengthen their advantage over those that can only afford to play one format or one that they feel they're better at.
Not sure that makes sense, but why not give people a choice as to the format they choose to play for big bucks. Hard enough going against the elite by making it easier for them by only having to prepare for one format.
Probably not popular with the "Chum chum club" but I think the NFFC has it spot on with multiple formats so that everyone can make their own choices. [/QUOTE]I very much agree with this. This is my first year in the NFFC and I only am doing the OC. However, next year I will be entering the Classic or Primetime or even both. I like the fact that the two events are different and you have a choice as to which one is more appealing to you. I've always played in leagues that award a full PPR and am intrigued by the challenge that the Classic would bring in strategy with the .5 PPR for RB's. With that being said, I would not be turned off at all from participating if the move was made to have a uniform PPR across all leagues.
quote:Originally posted by KJ Duke:
I'd prefer to have the same scoring and same playoff format for all main events.
The classic remains the more difficult contest to win with the two extra teams and the shallower player pool, but I don't think it needs to be complicated with different scoring or playoffs. (Unless of course you want to go the Victory Pts route for the classic).
I agree that the classic is more difficult because of the number of teams in each league. I think the NFFC sets itself apart by offering options for everyone. If everything is the same, then the players that play as many teams as possible in each main event format strengthen their advantage over those that can only afford to play one format or one that they feel they're better at.Not sure that makes sense, but why not give people a choice as to the format they choose to play for big bucks. Hard enough going against the elite by making it easier for them by only having to prepare for one format.
Probably not popular with the "Chum chum club" but I think the NFFC has it spot on with multiple formats so that everyone can make their own choices. [/QUOTE]I very much agree with this. This is my first year in the NFFC and I only am doing the OC. However, next year I will be entering the Classic or Primetime or even both. I like the fact that the two events are different and you have a choice as to which one is more appealing to you. I've always played in leagues that award a full PPR and am intrigued by the challenge that the Classic would bring in strategy with the .5 PPR for RB's. With that being said, I would not be turned off at all from participating if the move was made to have a uniform PPR across all leagues.
Go Big Red!
NFFC League Playoffs 2012
KJ's proposal on the other thread is a much better idea, compromising the 4 team and 6 team playoff scenarios.