Gronk n' Graham

King of Queens
Posts: 5262
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 6:00 pm

Gronk n' Graham

Post by King of Queens » Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:46 pm

Looking ahead to 2012:

What are the chances we see BOTH Gronkowski and Graham get selected BEFORE a second WR (after Calvin) is taken?

NFFC scoring, of course

BillyWaz
Posts: 10913
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 6:00 pm

Gronk n' Graham

Post by BillyWaz » Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:58 pm

Slim and none.

User avatar
Coltsfan
Posts: 3443
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 6:00 pm
Location: Evansville, IN

Gronk n' Graham

Post by Coltsfan » Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:02 pm

I don't see it happening. People are pre-disposed to NOT taking a TE that early. I don't think they could score enough points to be taken that early.


Wayne

King of Queens
Posts: 5262
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 6:00 pm

Gronk n' Graham

Post by King of Queens » Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:15 pm

Follow-up question: what TWO wide receivers do you see going ahead of Gronk n' Graham?

User avatar
Coltsfan
Posts: 3443
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 6:00 pm
Location: Evansville, IN

Gronk n' Graham

Post by Coltsfan » Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:24 pm

I would think that Welker will go ahead of one or both on a consistent basis. Beyond that I would bet Fitz and Roddy will still go high next year. I''m not saying it will be justified but it will happen.


Wayne

User avatar
Coltsfan
Posts: 3443
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 6:00 pm
Location: Evansville, IN

Gronk n' Graham

Post by Coltsfan » Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:42 pm

I also forgot about Andre. I would see him in the mid to late first.

I think we'll consistently see 7-8 RB's, Rodgers, and Calvin go early in drafts followed by a few of the WR's mentioned mixed in with Gronk and Graham.


Wayne

User avatar
boutrous11
Posts: 1573
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 6:00 pm

Gronk n' Graham

Post by boutrous11 » Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:55 pm

What if Gronk scores 20 tds?

Coyote Streakers
Posts: 168
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 6:00 pm

Gronk n' Graham

Post by Coyote Streakers » Thu Dec 15, 2011 4:40 pm

I'm a firm believer in building teams around RB's and WR's therefore I doubt I could personally justify taking them that early, sure they are fine players but I like the look of my teams better hammering rbs and wrs first.

Jersey Dawg
Posts: 816
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 6:00 pm

Gronk n' Graham

Post by Jersey Dawg » Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:22 am

These guys are better than almost anyone's first WR. The game is changing. We have to learn to adapt.

User avatar
Coltsfan
Posts: 3443
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 6:00 pm
Location: Evansville, IN

Gronk n' Graham

Post by Coltsfan » Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:27 am

Originally posted by Jersey Dawg:
These guys are better than almost anyone's first WR. The game is changing. We have to learn to adapt. I agree but I just don't think that people will.

For me it will be a matter of which position can a get a nice upside guy late. If there is a TE I really like in rounds 7-9 then I might go WR. (And that would work both ways.)


Wayne

Post Reply