Page 1 of 3
This ruling is BS from the NFFC
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 12:39 pm
by warchild
[ September 13, 2008, 06:56 PM: Message edited by: warchild ]
This ruling is BS from the NFFC
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 12:47 pm
by mikeybok
Nothing says they have too either. Why do you assume you know better than the NFFC and the NFL and a bunch of others on this site ... Oh ... eh ... never mind ... don't answer that.
As smart as you are .... you should have prepaired for this? No?
[ September 13, 2008, 06:47 PM: Message edited by: Ugly Yellow Tomatoes ]
This ruling is BS from the NFFC
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 12:56 pm
by gomizzouman
It is not fair to a bunch of people in Houston that lost their homes either. Should Greg and Tom be responsible for that as well. They made the right decision in a tough spot. The last time I checked, you have the ability to carry 20 spots on your roster and just yesterday you had the opportunity to make roster moves through the waiver wire.
Times like these show a lot about people.
The inability for people to take any personal responsibility amazes me.
This ruling is BS from the NFFC
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 12:58 pm
by Superpion
Originally posted by warchild:
Their is nothing in your rules about what happens if a game gets postponed. To say you can't add a free agent period is a copout for this circumstance. There is nothing in the rules that say you "Can't open up a second free agency period for natural disasters too". This is not fair to a bunch of the contestant's in your leagues. So I guess that the other high stakes events that ruled in the exact same manner are copping out too, eh? In reality, the whole thing was a conspiracy against you. Getting the hurricane to damage Reliant Stadium was the tricky part but Greg and Tom pulled some connections just so they could jerk your chain....
This ruling is BS from the NFFC
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 1:01 pm
by Team Canada
Warchild
Shame on you!
You will get what's coming to you
This ruling is BS from the NFFC
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 2:08 pm
by BONGIZMO
Times like these show a lot about people.
AMEN...let's get our priorities in order here folks...
This ruling is BS from the NFFC
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 2:25 pm
by perrylin
Warchild,
Even if Greg or Tom could open up a 2nd free agency period, why should they?
You decided to enter a high stakes fantasy football contest. Lots of variables effect scoring and a lot of it is off the field. You have to contend with the personal lives of players, injuries, coaching decisions, matchups, and inclement weather. Why would having to deal with league scheduling decisions be any different?
Grow a pair and stop whining like a little baby.
This ruling is BS from the NFFC
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 2:30 pm
by BLACKHAND
warchild , that is pretty low and selfish. what about people with no power and flooded houses that wont even put a lineup in. we got to take a step back here boyz and count our blessings.
This ruling is BS from the NFFC
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 4:50 pm
by Shrink Attack
There's no perfect solution, but there is no better solution than the one offered by the NFFC.
And this is coming from someone who owns D. Mason, K. Brown, and Owen Daniels with no viable replacements.
This ruling is BS from the NFFC
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 5:04 am
by renman
While I do not think attacking the NFFC is/was the right thing to do or fair. I do believe there was a better solution. It was posted by Weber on the other 20 page thread.
While I have accepted the decision and will be doing my best to win shorthanded this weekend... I do think we can discuss the issue in an effort to continue to improve the NFFC.