How Many Lost Because...
How Many Lost Because...
Of the fluke Patriots game??? Ended up losing by two points this week because the Dolphins secondary couldn't tackle a 5'4" WR who scored 16.9 points on a single play. Also worth noting, we didn't have our #1 pick playing (Foster) and our kicker didn't play (Buehler).
2007 NFFC Classic Champion
How Many Lost Because...
Go Getta, I lost my one game because Garrett Hartley got hurt and I coudn't get another kicker on the roster. LUCK. It's part of the game.
I never lost a game. I only ran out of time. Bobby Layne
Kid....if you're going to make it in this league, you're going to have to learn to drink. Bobby Layne
Kid....if you're going to make it in this league, you're going to have to learn to drink. Bobby Layne
- boutrous11
- Posts: 1573
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 6:00 pm
How Many Lost Because...
Originally posted by TOXIC ASSETS:
LUCK. It's part of the game. what? when did this happen?
LUCK. It's part of the game. what? when did this happen?
How Many Lost Because...
Originally posted by TOXIC ASSETS:
Go Getta, I lost my one game because Garrett Hartley got hurt and I coudn't get another kicker on the roster. LUCK. It's part of the game. Yeah we drafted Buehler in a August 29th draft and couldn't get another kicker. Ended up losing by 2 points when I would've picked up Carpenter.
Go Getta, I lost my one game because Garrett Hartley got hurt and I coudn't get another kicker on the roster. LUCK. It's part of the game. Yeah we drafted Buehler in a August 29th draft and couldn't get another kicker. Ended up losing by 2 points when I would've picked up Carpenter.
2007 NFFC Classic Champion
-
- Posts: 3525
- Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 6:00 pm
How Many Lost Because...
This has always been part of the NFFC but I sure would like to see it change for next year.
The rosters were loaded in plenty of time to run FAAB by Wednesday and I think that's always been the hiccup in the past.
I wasn't really effected by the rule but it stinks for everyone who was.
Maybe Greg can change that for 2012.
Good luck the rest of the way!
The rosters were loaded in plenty of time to run FAAB by Wednesday and I think that's always been the hiccup in the past.
I wasn't really effected by the rule but it stinks for everyone who was.
Maybe Greg can change that for 2012.
Good luck the rest of the way!
How Many Lost Because...
Originally posted by Route C:
This has always been part of the NFFC but I sure would like to see it change for next year.
The rosters were loaded in plenty of time to run FAAB by Wednesday and I think that's always been the hiccup in the past.
I wasn't really effected by the rule but it stinks for everyone who was.
Maybe Greg can change that for 2012.
Good luck the rest of the way! we all have plenty of bench spots. we choose to roll the dice with one kicker - it's risk/reward to get that extra WR or RB. No need for a rule change.
This has always been part of the NFFC but I sure would like to see it change for next year.
The rosters were loaded in plenty of time to run FAAB by Wednesday and I think that's always been the hiccup in the past.
I wasn't really effected by the rule but it stinks for everyone who was.
Maybe Greg can change that for 2012.
Good luck the rest of the way! we all have plenty of bench spots. we choose to roll the dice with one kicker - it's risk/reward to get that extra WR or RB. No need for a rule change.
How Many Lost Because...
I lost in the Ultimate because of Aaron Hernandez's last catch.
-
- Posts: 3525
- Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 6:00 pm
How Many Lost Because...
Originally posted by mattjb:
quote:Originally posted by Route C:
This has always been part of the NFFC but I sure would like to see it change for next year.
The rosters were loaded in plenty of time to run FAAB by Wednesday and I think that's always been the hiccup in the past.
I wasn't really effected by the rule but it stinks for everyone who was.
Maybe Greg can change that for 2012.
Good luck the rest of the way! we all have plenty of bench spots. we choose to roll the dice with one kicker - it's risk/reward to get that extra WR or RB. No need for a rule change. [/QUOTE]Sure there is. Anything that gives more control/choices to the players is a good thing.
I don't really see a downside to it other than playing devils advocate...I mean it's not like it's a new concept right. It's the difference in which week we start waivers which could be week 1..2..3..4..5 etc.
quote:Originally posted by Route C:
This has always been part of the NFFC but I sure would like to see it change for next year.
The rosters were loaded in plenty of time to run FAAB by Wednesday and I think that's always been the hiccup in the past.
I wasn't really effected by the rule but it stinks for everyone who was.
Maybe Greg can change that for 2012.
Good luck the rest of the way! we all have plenty of bench spots. we choose to roll the dice with one kicker - it's risk/reward to get that extra WR or RB. No need for a rule change. [/QUOTE]Sure there is. Anything that gives more control/choices to the players is a good thing.
I don't really see a downside to it other than playing devils advocate...I mean it's not like it's a new concept right. It's the difference in which week we start waivers which could be week 1..2..3..4..5 etc.
How Many Lost Because...
There is slightly less luck than you think.
Buehler & Hartley news was out August 28th, they were confirmed out 9/2 and 9/1 respectively. Drafting a guy #1 overall who might not play week one is another example. If you don't keep up then you roll with your "bad luck".
Buehler & Hartley news was out August 28th, they were confirmed out 9/2 and 9/1 respectively. Drafting a guy #1 overall who might not play week one is another example. If you don't keep up then you roll with your "bad luck".