People that include their roster as a “signature”

nnoy · Post by **nnoy** » Tue Sep 07, 2004 7:57 am

What’s everyone’s feeling on what appears to be a popular trend: people including their entire roster in their signature.

Personally it’s a little a”nnoy”ing to me. It will be interesting to see if signatures start to magically disappear after it becomes apparent that some of these teams are in the bottom tier.

If I were to create one it would read

Vick/Favre/Grossman
McAllister/S.Davis/Martin/A. Smith/Bryson
Keyshawn/Roy Williams/Terrell/Hilliard/Patten (starter)/ Pinkston
Shockey
Longwell
TB/Min

However, I do not feel the need to constantly put my roster in everyone’s face.

[ September 07, 2004, 01:58 PM: Message edited by: nnoy ]

brad_brown · Post by **brad_brown** » Tue Sep 07, 2004 8:11 am

I don't feel as though they are there in everyone's face (which makes it sound like we are saying we are better than you).

Truth of the matter is that it's much easier to debate roster spots, etc... without have to repeat what your team makeup is every time. Also, people appreciate being able to see what someone else might have been able to do from the same draft spot in a different league.

It is really more for informational purposes than anything. Since they don't have leagues and rosters posted yet this is the only avenue for people to see other teams.

If it is really bugging you, don't read them.

Jersey Dawg · Post by **Jersey Dawg** » Wed Sep 08, 2004 11:47 am

I list my roster, at least this early in the season, for ease of discussion. Certainly not for bragging rights. Think I'm proud with Wheatley as my #2 RB? Well, I'm not....

Pete