Overall Ranking
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 10:16 am
still seeing just the top 25 ... can't be that hard to fix ???
Page 1 of 2
Overall Ranking
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 10:18 am
KJ, I spoke with STATS today again about that and they said they will get that taken care of.
Overall Ranking
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 2:01 pm
KJ Duke,
You scored 85.2 points. Do you really want to see where you team ranks against the entire league. I would be suprised if you are any more than 20 spots from the bottom.
You scored 85.2 points. Do you really want to see where you team ranks against the entire league. I would be suprised if you are any more than 20 spots from the bottom.
Overall Ranking
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:57 pm
Originally posted by KJ Duke:
still seeing just the top 25 ... can't be that hard to fix ??? We put a man on the moon, and we still dont have the overall top 224 list !
still seeing just the top 25 ... can't be that hard to fix ??? We put a man on the moon, and we still dont have the overall top 224 list !
Overall Ranking
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 4:02 pm
Originally posted by Liquid:
We put a man on the moon, and we still dont have the overall top 224 list ! hehe. i got to remember that one. thanks for the laugh.
We put a man on the moon, and we still dont have the overall top 224 list ! hehe. i got to remember that one. thanks for the laugh.
Overall Ranking
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:00 pm
Originally posted by skipman:
KJ Duke,
You scored 85.2 points. Do you really want to see where you team ranks against the entire league. I would be suprised if you are any more than 20 spots from the bottom. yeah Skippy, like the punishment but hoping for a top 200 ranking! ... also curious to see if anyone that won (which I did) is below me - I doubt they could be.
KJ Duke,
You scored 85.2 points. Do you really want to see where you team ranks against the entire league. I would be suprised if you are any more than 20 spots from the bottom. yeah Skippy, like the punishment but hoping for a top 200 ranking! ... also curious to see if anyone that won (which I did) is below me - I doubt they could be.
Overall Ranking
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2004 1:28 am
85.2 points is horrendous.
Overall Ranking
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2004 4:11 am
Yeah K of Q,
In LV2, we had the #2 ranked team (Frenso Fans) lose to the #1 (183.2-175.6) then we had Old KJ Duke win in a 85.2 to 81.2 debacle.
In LV2, we had the #2 ranked team (Frenso Fans) lose to the #1 (183.2-175.6) then we had Old KJ Duke win in a 85.2 to 81.2 debacle.
Overall Ranking
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2004 4:40 am
A debacle indeed.
It's a sad state of affairs when the losing score of one game is higher than the COMBINED score of another game. I would be shocked if this occurred in any other NFFC league.
It's a sad state of affairs when the losing score of one game is higher than the COMBINED score of another game. I would be shocked if this occurred in any other NFFC league.
Overall Ranking
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2004 5:26 am
Originally posted by King of Queens:
A debacle indeed.
It's a sad state of affairs when the losing score of one game is higher than the COMBINED score of another game. I would be shocked if this occurred in any other NFFC league. Sad for everyone but me. I am quite happy about it. With that kind of luck whoever plays me next week should be shakin' in their fantasy boots.
[ September 18, 2004, 11:29 AM: Message edited by: KJ Duke ]
A debacle indeed.
It's a sad state of affairs when the losing score of one game is higher than the COMBINED score of another game. I would be shocked if this occurred in any other NFFC league. Sad for everyone but me. I am quite happy about it. With that kind of luck whoever plays me next week should be shakin' in their fantasy boots.
[ September 18, 2004, 11:29 AM: Message edited by: KJ Duke ]