Interesting contrast
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 2:49 pm
I drafted two teams in the Classic this year, and something interesting has emerged.
These two teams were drafted with the following things exactly the same:
1) Same exact drafter
2) Same exact draft strategy
3) Same exact draft position (14th)
4) Same cheat sheet
5) Same (roughly) WW targets/bids/strategy
The ONLY difference is that Team #1 was drafted 4 days earlier than Team #2. I checked the cheat sheets from the two drafts and they are almost identical except for some very minor differences. My targeted players were the same, and I also tend to draft the same players in multiple drafts if they're available. Probably not a sound strategy, but if I like a player, I take him multiple times and I don't "hedge" by taking different players in different drafts to lower risk. This tends to result in my rosters being MORE alike than they are different.
The result after 9 weeks (before the Thursday night game):
Team #1 is 265th out of 280 teams
Team #2 is 27th out of 280 teams
That's another reason this hobby can be so frustrating sometimes. I approached these drafts and managed these teams in essentially identical ways, yet the outcomes couldn't be more different.
Obviously, who you're drafting against, which players fall to you, and luck (injuries, etc.) all play a major role.
I see some major, big-time fantasy names near the bottom in the overall Classic standings this year. These are players whose skill is unquestioned, yet the 2011 season has absolutely kicked their butt.
These two teams were drafted with the following things exactly the same:
1) Same exact drafter
2) Same exact draft strategy
3) Same exact draft position (14th)
4) Same cheat sheet
5) Same (roughly) WW targets/bids/strategy
The ONLY difference is that Team #1 was drafted 4 days earlier than Team #2. I checked the cheat sheets from the two drafts and they are almost identical except for some very minor differences. My targeted players were the same, and I also tend to draft the same players in multiple drafts if they're available. Probably not a sound strategy, but if I like a player, I take him multiple times and I don't "hedge" by taking different players in different drafts to lower risk. This tends to result in my rosters being MORE alike than they are different.
The result after 9 weeks (before the Thursday night game):
Team #1 is 265th out of 280 teams
Team #2 is 27th out of 280 teams
That's another reason this hobby can be so frustrating sometimes. I approached these drafts and managed these teams in essentially identical ways, yet the outcomes couldn't be more different.
Obviously, who you're drafting against, which players fall to you, and luck (injuries, etc.) all play a major role.
I see some major, big-time fantasy names near the bottom in the overall Classic standings this year. These are players whose skill is unquestioned, yet the 2011 season has absolutely kicked their butt.