Frank Gore Or A Stud WR? What Says You?
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:18 am
Pop quiz, hotshot. Let's say you're sitting at the back of the first round in your draft (either a Classic format or a Primetime one). You're seeing all of the benefits of grabbing two stud WRs in our scoring system (or a full PPR), you've seen the depth at RB in the third and fourth rounds and you like the idea of loading up early at the WR position.
You've done your analysis and you think you have a very good chance to get two of the following WRs - Moss, Calvin Johnson, Steve Smith, Reggie Wayne, Greg Jennings or Roddy White. You're fired up about the possibility of getting any two from that group. So you're all set to go with that approach and then your draft unfolds. And what happens?
Frank Gore is staring you in the face.
Gore is a very talented RB. Unfortunately he's stuck on a terrible team and his numbers of late haven't quite been as good as his talent indicates should be the case. Last season, for example, he finished 12th among RBs in the NFFC in average points per game.
There's no denying his talent, though, and the 49ers insist he's going to be the focal point of their offense. Plus, he's one of the few RBs with the potential to catch 55-60 passes (only two RBs did that last season). In any scoring format, he has strong RB1 potential, but in the NFFC or a full PPR format, his upside is even higher.
So there you sit, staring at Gore and wondering if he's worthy of passing on the plan of having two stud WRs to start your draft. What do you do? Take Gore and then come back with a stud WR or do you pass on Gore and take the two stud WRs?
What says the experts here?
You've done your analysis and you think you have a very good chance to get two of the following WRs - Moss, Calvin Johnson, Steve Smith, Reggie Wayne, Greg Jennings or Roddy White. You're fired up about the possibility of getting any two from that group. So you're all set to go with that approach and then your draft unfolds. And what happens?
Frank Gore is staring you in the face.
Gore is a very talented RB. Unfortunately he's stuck on a terrible team and his numbers of late haven't quite been as good as his talent indicates should be the case. Last season, for example, he finished 12th among RBs in the NFFC in average points per game.
There's no denying his talent, though, and the 49ers insist he's going to be the focal point of their offense. Plus, he's one of the few RBs with the potential to catch 55-60 passes (only two RBs did that last season). In any scoring format, he has strong RB1 potential, but in the NFFC or a full PPR format, his upside is even higher.
So there you sit, staring at Gore and wondering if he's worthy of passing on the plan of having two stud WRs to start your draft. What do you do? Take Gore and then come back with a stud WR or do you pass on Gore and take the two stud WRs?
What says the experts here?