2006 Potential Rules Changes

King of Queens
Posts: 5262
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 6:00 pm

2006 Potential Rules Changes

Post by King of Queens » Mon Jul 10, 2006 2:41 pm

(1) 19-man rosters for Weeks 13-16

(2) FAAB deadline pushed back to 8pm EDT/EST

Any thoughts on these? I know there's been discussion about them in the past, but it's time for one last push to get these enacted for 2006.

Route Collectors
Posts: 3525
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 6:00 pm

2006 Potential Rules Changes

Post by Route Collectors » Mon Jul 10, 2006 2:45 pm

1)Big supporter of roster increase.

2)I'm ok with it the way it is but wouldn't object to the change if it makes the game more enjoyable for others.

King of Queens
Posts: 5262
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 6:00 pm

2006 Potential Rules Changes

Post by King of Queens » Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:27 pm

Originally posted by SNAKE:
SNAKE is for both!...SNAKE would also like to recommend here for the first time the institution of the Faulk Rule (Kevin, that is, in dedication to Mr. Bayley), in which each and every FF owner out there in FF-land can take back that ONE, single, fatal mistake (like starting a player that gave you a 0 as opposed to a 22 and costing you a game or $95,000 for example), that was made during the season/playoffs and have the ability to reverse the past and actually go in and change the decision on which player to start (owners shall be limited to one change per FF season)...SNAKE Nothing like pouring salt into a snake bite...

King of Queens
Posts: 5262
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 6:00 pm

2006 Potential Rules Changes

Post by King of Queens » Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:41 pm

My apologies then. And my ongoing condolensces to the Bayley family...

User avatar
Diesel
Posts: 5887
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 6:00 pm

2006 Potential Rules Changes

Post by Diesel » Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:48 pm

Not sure if that extra roster spot is a must for changes, but I am all for a later time for the free agent deadline...
*Ranked #1 Average Fantasy Football Player in the Nation 2004-2013

"Fantasy sports are all about LUCK. Except when I win."

RiFF
Posts: 1444
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 6:00 pm

2006 Potential Rules Changes

Post by RiFF » Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:43 pm

Not sure that an expanded roster is required for week 13, but I would support an additional player for the playoffs (weeks 14-16). That may require an additional week of Free Agency.

The later the better for FAAB deadline.

King of Queens
Posts: 5262
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 6:00 pm

2006 Potential Rules Changes

Post by King of Queens » Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:54 pm

Originally posted by RiFF:
Not sure that an expanded roster is required for week 13, but I would support an additional player for the playoffs (weeks 14-16). That may require an additional week of Free Agency. Either way is fine. Not sure that it matters, so long as an extra spot is available for the three weeks in which no pickups are allowed.

sportsbettingman
Posts: 1805
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 6:00 pm

2006 Potential Rules Changes

Post by sportsbettingman » Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:30 pm

MORE BENCH SPOTS!!!

Favors the better players...stash that rookie for the 2nd half run!!!

~Lance
"The first man what makes a move can count amongst 'is treasure a ball from this pistol."

~Long John Silver

Post Reply