NFFC Message Boards

Sorry it's so late this year. Actually released a week ago. Top 100 list:
http://ffreview.com/top10.htm

You are forgiven.
(For being late)

So if you did not play in the WCOFF, you cannot make the this list? Even though the NFFC is suggested on the site.

If you play in the WCOFF, but bomb in the NFFC, you can still make the list.

I am sure there are guys/girls in the NFFC who should be on this list.

Here is an idea for a list.

Contact WCOFF, NFFC and ask them for their Top 100 in Winnings since inception. Add up Total Winnings for a top 100 list based on Lifetime Earnings.

To me anybody on that list who did not win a 110k/200k prize, deseves to be the considered the best. Anybody over 25k in winnings knows what they are doing.

Otherwise, that list is as useful as the BCS formula for deciding a National Championship.

Derek "Lumpy" Anderson

Monetary winnings is not a consideration here. Neither is won-loss record, points scored, or any other logical factor. To be considered for the top spot, there is really only one factor:

You have to write a book titled "Drafting to Win By Passing Your Draft Pick to the Person Next To You"

those rankings are funny. let's put it this way. if any of those guys were in your league would you feel threatened??? if you answer this question with a yes answer you better stick to free yahoo leagues.

i have the runner up from last year in my nffc main event league and look forward to the competition and challenge. i am already fighting a losing battle if i thought anything else.

my list of top fantasy football players.

1) stool pigeon
2-99) apply within

see you in chicago dylan.

Did you play any satellites this year?

you bet scott, and no disrespect to you for making that list. i know your one of the best fantasy players from experience. no sat's this year, my schedule was too hectic to plan one in advance.

first beers on me buddy. see you in chi.

[ September 01, 2006, 07:19 AM: Message edited by: stool pigeon ]

The monetary earnings are have an exponential factor and therefore, you are right they're not used. Instead, I used a linear method concerning finishers. In other words, the grand champion of WCOFF is not 80% better than the 2nd place finisher, even though he may earn that much more. Instead, he is 1 point better that year.

You will find that all the people near the top of the list have a history of finishing very well in WCOFF. The WCOFF rankings are very accurate. They may not have won overall, but there are only 4 champions so far, and they are all ranked as well.

I would like to have better NFFC information to integrate into the rankings, but they did not release the information I requested, so it's limited.

Like I always say, if there are better rankings out there, please show them to me.

Originally posted by The Real Deal:

I would like to have better NFFC information to integrate into the rankings, but they did not release the information I requested, so it's limited.

Like I always say, if there are better rankings out there, please show them to me. It's like ranking the NFC's QB's in order of best to worst and calling it a list of the worlds best NFL QB's. When asked why Brady and Manning are left off the list ... you respond ... couldn't collect the AFC data on QB's?

This is the dumbest thread and the dumbest list I have ever seen (and I just waisted 10 minutes of my life being part of it no less). Why limit your rankings to the world ... I might make a list of the best FF players in the whole universe and trump your world rankings (and only list my home league players).

These comments are great.

Don't be offended Team Legacy.
No one thinks you are terrible.
The list is a big joke, that's all.

K of Q - You crack me up. Often.

Real Deal - If you have a terrible draft - don't post it. Words of advice.


Stool Pigeons - Fear? Nah. A mouse creeps me out though.

[ September 04, 2006, 03:08 PM: Message edited by: Sound Advice ]