Why is live scoring even running?????

BillyWaz · Post by **BillyWaz** » Sat Dec 29, 2007 2:12 pm

I only ask this because I know that in years 2 and 3 of the NFFC they divided the yearly totals by 17 instead of 16 games.

I just hope that the lifetime standings don't have week 17 ADDED since no one set lineups this week.

BillyWaz · Post by **BillyWaz** » Sat Dec 29, 2007 3:12 pm

Look at your lifetime points Snake, and divide it by 64 (4 seasons x 16 games), and I guarantee you get a better average than you currently have (because it is divided by 66).

I have mentioned this a few times, but nothing has been changed, and I just don't want to see tonight's points added in and create more confusion.

While I admit I probably have a little more interest in the lifetime standings than you, it doesn't keep me up at night, but as usual, thanks so much for your concern.

[ December 29, 2007, 09:13 PM: Message edited by: BillyWaz ]

Ted's Cracked Head · Post by **Ted's Cracked Head** » Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:30 pm

Not to burst your bubbles anyway but I think that all of the lifetime scores are incorrect. Mine isn't even close and it has nothing to do with 16 or 17 games. The numbers are wrong, period.

BillyWaz · Post by **BillyWaz** » Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:51 pm

Originally posted by Ted's Cracked Head:
Not to burst your bubbles anyway but I think that all of the lifetime scores are incorrect. Mine isn't even close and it has nothing to do with 16 or 17 games. The numbers are wrong, period. I hear you on that Rob. I wish in the consolation and championship rounds that they would have the 3 week score separate from the average as this would be very easy to fix.

Hopefully they will get everything correct going forward.