Nag, your example is a tough one. We do not sit here on Sundays and look over the starting lineups of every team. It's just not possible to do that and it doesn't make sense.
However, if after the competition is done and an owner alerts us that one team had a full starting lineup the week before and suddenly inserted all inactive players, that could possibly constitute collusion. Someone who inserted an all "dead" lineup isn't a dead owner, he is someone with a different agenda. I have a feeling I know what we'd do in that instance, but I'll react to the situation if/when it happens.
I think in my example above, you can tell the difference between a "dead team" as you suggested and "collusion." And we will act properly.
But that being said, I don't see this happening with the group that we've assembled for the NFFC and I think you'll find most every owner battling for points right down to the final week of the season. Remember, even non-playoff teams advance to their own post-season event, so there's reason to keep fighting every week as a last place team now can still win the Consolation Bowl and finish the season with a profit.
NFFC Definition of Collusion?
-
- Posts: 36413
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 6:00 pm
NFFC Definition of Collusion?
Founder, National Fantasy Football Championship & National Fantasy Baseball Championship
Twitter: @GregAmbrosius
Twitter: @GregAmbrosius