NFFC Message Boards

I only ask this because I know that in years 2 and 3 of the NFFC they divided the yearly totals by 17 instead of 16 games.

I just hope that the lifetime standings don't have week 17 ADDED since no one set lineups this week.

Look at your lifetime points Snake, and divide it by 64 (4 seasons x 16 games), and I guarantee you get a better average than you currently have (because it is divided by 66).

I have mentioned this a few times, but nothing has been changed, and I just don't want to see tonight's points added in and create more confusion.

While I admit I probably have a little more interest in the lifetime standings than you, it doesn't keep me up at night, but as usual, thanks so much for your concern.

[ December 29, 2007, 09:13 PM: Message edited by: BillyWaz ]

Not to burst your bubbles anyway but I think that all of the lifetime scores are incorrect. Mine isn't even close and it has nothing to do with 16 or 17 games. The numbers are wrong, period.

Originally posted by Ted's Cracked Head:
Not to burst your bubbles anyway but I think that all of the lifetime scores are incorrect. Mine isn't even close and it has nothing to do with 16 or 17 games. The numbers are wrong, period. I hear you on that Rob. I wish in the consolation and championship rounds that they would have the 3 week score separate from the average as this would be very easy to fix.

Hopefully they will get everything correct going forward.