NFFC Message Boards

Originally posted by KJ Duke:
Congrats GLU.
Happy new year - 3RR Bowl-I worked ! When should I be expecting my winnings?

Good ol' Michael Vick gets hurt and costs me the 3RR title.

I should change my team name to GDLM

To answer Marc's question, yes, this league did enhance my opinion of 3RR. There was a much more even distribution of talent here, most clearly demonstrated by picks 3.01-3.04 vs. 3.11-3.14.

Originally posted by KJ Duke:
FINAL 3RR

(12)GLU 468.7
(6) KOQ 454.2
(4) Sound Advice 444.8
(13)Capt Hook 429.1
5) KJ Duke 429
(3) RI Workhrs 408.85
(1) eddiejag 397.3
(14)TCH 385.65
(2) Fisher 378.05
(11)da bears 369.35
(10)Snake 351.25
(7) UFS 350.05
(8) Red Ryder 349.55
(9) Gekko 347.9

Since this is only ONE set of data, we can't put too much in it. HOWEVER, I found it very interesting that before this draft , most were talking about how the middle of the draft doesn't get any advantage (actually a disadvantage). And as it would turn out, 10, 7, 8, 9 were the bottom 4 teams!

Basically, this draft proved what everyone thought all along IMO.

I'm all for 3CC.

Originally posted by BillyWaz:
I'm all for 3CC. 3 City Challenge?

Originally posted by BillyWaz:
quote:Originally posted by KJ Duke:
(10)Snake 351.25
(7) UFS 350.05
(8) Red Ryder 349.55
(9) Gekko 347.9

And as it would turn out, 10, 7, 8, 9 were the bottom 4 teams!


[/QUOTE]Well what would you expect, look at who drafted the bottom 4 teams. Just kdding guys. This info doesn't really prove much as we didn't draft D's or K's and didn't set a lineup each week, but being part of the draft showed me it is a definite improvement over serpentine drafting.

Originally posted by BillyWaz:
quote:Originally posted by KJ Duke:
FINAL 3RR

(12)GLU 468.7
(6) KOQ 454.2
(4) Sound Advice 444.8
(13)Capt Hook 429.1
5) KJ Duke 429
(3) RI Workhrs 408.85
(1) eddiejag 397.3
(14)TCH 385.65
(2) Fisher 378.05
(11)da bears 369.35
(10)Snake 351.25
(7) UFS 350.05
(8) Red Ryder 349.55
(9) Gekko 347.9

Since this is only ONE set of data, we can't put too much in it. HOWEVER, I found it very interesting that before this draft , most were talking about how the middle of the draft doesn't get any advantage (actually a disadvantage). And as it would turn out, 10, 7, 8, 9 were the bottom 4 teams!

Basically, this draft proved what everyone thought all along IMO.

I'm all for 3CC. [/QUOTE]I would be curious why it "worked"
LT2 had a good finish, not the same crazy numbers he was putting up from weeks 4 thru 10.
SO by changing in round 3 did it impact that owner more because the percieved advantage was taken away by the football player himself?

Based on the numbers maybe the Top Teams in 3RR had MJD and Bush late in the season? And if so, did this accomplish anything at all?

Originally posted by King of Queens:
quote:Originally posted by BillyWaz:
I'm all for 3CC. 3 City Challenge? [/QUOTE]Typo.... 3RR. :rolleyes:

It is crazy when you hear acronyms, and you somehow relate them to fantasy.

In English class, we were reading the play "A Christmas Carol. The teacher I work with asked the class if they knew what "DC" (direct center- on the stage) stood for?

As no one responded right away, I wanted to yell out "DRAFT CHAMPS"!

"Hi, my name is BillyWaz, and yes.... I have a fantasy football addiction!"

[ January 01, 2007, 12:45 PM: Message edited by: BillyWaz ]

Originally posted by BillyWaz:
It is crazy when you hear acronyms, and you somehow relate them to fantasy.I'm still waiting to hear from FISHER about "the whole new meaning" of BBDS on August 31st

KJ, can you please list rosters again and/or injuries to the teams as those players could not be replaced. TIA.

This worked because the draft process was more fair.

It has nothing to do with LT.