NFFC Champions League 2 Draft Order

TamuScarecrow · Post by **TamuScarecrow** » Thu Jun 22, 2006 5:01 pm

Three things are for sure this weekend:

1) I am staying here in Arkansas and the cheatsheets will be ready for Monday night.
2) Strictly non-alcoholic beverages this weekend which means Tiki or Portis will not be #3 on my cheatsheets.
3) Installed Mongoose anti-virus software tonight to keep away Snake-charming PM's.

eddiejag44 · Post by **eddiejag44** » Fri Jun 23, 2006 12:24 am

It has to be TIKI, he went 65 in TOM'S, all star league, PORTIS was next at 58.I hate the 4th slot too, but i would rather have TIKI at 4 , then picks 5,6,7,8,.

BillyWaz · Post by **BillyWaz** » Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:03 am

Originally posted by eddiejag44:
It has to be TIKI, he went 65 in TOM'S, all star league, PORTIS was next at 58.I hate the 4th slot too, but i would rather have TIKI at 4 , then picks 5,6,7,8,. But Snake has ridiculed all who would take him/them there! :rolleyes: The "visionary" is as every bit as much of a "herd follower" (still don't understand that) as everyone else.

I'm betting that Snake will go by whatever Tom's cheatsheet says for this draft.

Greg Ambrosius · Post by **Greg Ambrosius** » Fri Jun 23, 2006 2:44 am

Okay Snake, had we used KDS for this league and the top three guys had taken 1, 2, 3, what spot would you have requested? And after that, which spot would the No. 5 team had taken? How much different would this draft order have been if we had used KDS for this?

Greg Ambrosius · Post by **Greg Ambrosius** » Fri Jun 23, 2006 3:22 am

Originally posted by SNAKE:
SNAKE would have requested the #9 or #10 slot next...what would be your 4th most desirable option, Greg?...SNAKE thinks that if KDS was used here (btw - not complaining that it wasn't at all), that the results would have been greatly varied and more than likely to the pleasure of the majority of the owners here (that's why you made the wise decision to use it this year in The Main and that's to be applauded)...SNAKE No question the order would be different, which is why I like KDS so much. Anything to keep more owners happy about their draft spots!

Personally, I'd stay at No. 4 and take either of the two players in question (probably Tiki). The guy just seems to get it done year in and year out and that second round is such a crapshoot that being at No. 25 wouldn't kill me. But that's just me. I've been at 9 and 10 enough this year. I'd take No. 4.

Good luck to all. Okay, if you took 9, then would the next guy take 4 or would he move down? I'm interested.

TamuScarecrow · Post by **TamuScarecrow** » Fri Jun 23, 2006 3:35 am

I think what SNAKE is trying to say here, Greg, is he doesn't give a rat's rump about the next guy, all SNAKE cares about is SNAKE.