SNAKEtakes for 2010 NFL Playoffs

GOD Loves You · Post by **GOD Loves You** » Sun Jan 17, 2010 9:13 am

Over/Under on turnovers by Sanchez?
I'll set the line at 2

Over/Under on VJax yards?
55

Over/Under Chargers points?
27

Over/Under points Chargers win by?
10

I'll take the over on all 4!

sportsbettingman · Post by **sportsbettingman** » Sun Jan 17, 2010 9:22 am

Originally posted by GK:
...ok, so what's the early line on the Saints/Vikings game? ...GK 01/24/10 303 Vikings(Minnesota)
+170 +4 Over 53

18:45 ET 304 Saints(NewOrleans)
-200 -4 Under 53

BillyWaz · Post by **BillyWaz** » Sun Jan 17, 2010 9:22 am

Originally posted by King of Queens:
FYI: San Diego line has moved to (-9)

That's a pretty sizeable move.

If the Blackhand Rule of 90% holds, the Jets will EASILY cover this game. WOW!

I would EASILY change my bet (Chargers -7.5) based on that info to the Jets +9.

It rarely fails when the $$$ is always on one side late.

sportsbettingman · Post by **sportsbettingman** » Sun Jan 17, 2010 9:23 am

Originally posted by GOD Loves You:
quote:Originally posted by Eddiejag:
OK time to start singing to get the BOYS FIRED UP.
Pants on the ground pants on the ground hat on sidewaysCheck out the "Neil Young/Jimmy Fallon" version.

http://www.billboard.com/news/jimmy-fal ... 9701.story

The Boys need to continue feeding the ball to Felix if they want to make a comeback. [/QUOTE]Awww s.hit!

The Vikings just laid claim to that song in the post-game locker room!

Who-dey vs. Pants on the ground

America's schooling at its best!

[ January 17, 2010, 03:25 PM: Message edited by: sportsbettingman ]

sportsbettingman · Post by **sportsbettingman** » Sun Jan 17, 2010 9:28 am

Originally posted by BillyWaz:
quote:Originally posted by King of Queens:
FYI: San Diego line has moved to (-9)

That's a pretty sizeable move.

If the Blackhand Rule of 90% holds, the Jets will EASILY cover this game. WOW!

I would EASILY change my bet (Chargers -7.5) based on that info to the Jets +9.

It rarely fails when the $$$ is always on one side late. [/QUOTE]The sportsbooks are setting a TRAP! (taking sportsbook.com being one of the largest takers of worldwide action is a great base for "the public".)

Only 62% of the spread bettors are playing San Diego, yet the line has moved 1 1/2 points...I think they are suckering MORE action in on the Jets...to crush them.

Take SD on a false moving line.

[ January 17, 2010, 03:29 PM: Message edited by: sportsbettingman ]

Raiders · Post by **Raiders** » Sun Jan 17, 2010 9:32 am

Originally posted by Glenneration X:
How much of an a**hole is Brett Favre?
I can't stand him.

OK....its time!!!!
Go J-E-T-S, Jets, JETS, JETSSSSSSS!!!!

Snake, I've got to admit, I've watched your prognostigative (is that a word?) skills this year...and they're pretty impressive....but you've got the Jets game dead WRONG!

C'mon Mark, Thomas, Shonn, Revis, and Buddy's son.....take us to the Promised Land!

Glenn 38-10- Can you say Naanee?

BillyWaz · Post by **BillyWaz** » Sun Jan 17, 2010 9:34 am

Originally posted by sportsbettingman:
quote:Originally posted by BillyWaz:
quote:Originally posted by King of Queens:
FYI: San Diego line has moved to (-9)

That's a pretty sizeable move.

If the Blackhand Rule of 90% holds, the Jets will EASILY cover this game. WOW!

I would EASILY change my bet (Chargers -7.5) based on that info to the Jets +9.

It rarely fails when the $$$ is always on one side late. [/QUOTE]The sportsbooks are setting a TRAP! (taking sportsbook.com being one of the largest takers of worldwide action is a great base for "the public".)

Only 62% of the spread bettors are playing San Diego, yet the line has moved 1 1/2 points...I think they are suckering MORE action in on the Jets...to crush them.

Take SD on a false moving line. [/QUOTE]It doesn't matter Lance.

This is all for fun (I've always been atrocious a sports gambling and therefore don't do it), except for GK, who uses it as another platform to "swell up".

[ January 17, 2010, 03:35 PM: Message edited by: BillyWaz ]