Help! Right now w/ Lineup submission!!

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Sun Oct 23, 2005 5:47 am

Originally posted by 3INTBOY:
I cannot believe you would be forced to start a guy at the flex spot.
It's a flex player OPTION.
you weren't forced to start chambers at flex. YOU chose to start him at flex.

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Sun Oct 23, 2005 5:50 am

Originally posted by Nag':
It happens to the best of us...and to the average at best.

P.S. But at least you're carrying a backup Kicker and Defense on their byes instead of more position players. There's a lesson to be learned here, see if you can figure out what it is. nag - i found it interesting that the week you sandbagged me, your team slipped to 3-3.

was i tricked by holt and mccariens being listed as probable on friday...YES. i will also say this is a problem with only having 18 man rosters and trying to manage bye weeks. i take no responsibility for this.

[ October 23, 2005, 11:50 AM: Message edited by: Gordon Gekko ]

Nag' · Post by **Nag'** » Sun Oct 23, 2005 5:52 am

Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:
YES. i will also say this is a problem with only having 18 man rosters and trying to manage bye weeks. i take no responsibility for this. Ahhh, we're so close to the lesson at hand yet we don't want to see it. Free your mind gekko, free your mind.

BillyWaz · Post by **BillyWaz** » Sun Oct 23, 2005 5:55 am

Originally posted by Nag':
quote:Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:
YES. i will also say this is a problem with only having 18 man rosters and trying to manage bye weeks. i take no responsibility for this. Ahhh, we're so close to the lesson at hand yet we don't want to see it. Free your mind gekko, free your mind. [/QUOTE]Everyone has a bad year Nag. Like I tell Snake, "I would rather win one big one and be bad the rest of the time (which I don't think Gekko is) than be mediocre all of the time.

I swear you and Snake have to be related somehow!

3INTBOY · Post by **3INTBOY** » Sun Oct 23, 2005 5:59 am

I am not looking for an argument.

The flex is NOT a starting position. WR, TE RB is a position.

Flex is an OPTION as to what of those 3 positions you can use there. It should be FLEXIBLE who/when that player is placed in that linep place.....

Please show me where it states the Flex is a perminent submitted spot in a lineup.....

3'

I also do not appreciate having NO REPLY and NO PHONE number to speak with someone in case of a lineup submission problem.

[ October 23, 2005, 12:04 PM: Message edited by: 3INTBOY ]

Nag' · Post by **Nag'** » Sun Oct 23, 2005 6:00 am

Originally posted by BillyWaz:
I swear you and Snake have to be related somehow! Yeah, I might be. Hmmm, let's see, snake calls you Wazass....I'd think more appropriate is Kizass.

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Sun Oct 23, 2005 6:04 am

Originally posted by 3INTBOY:
I am not looking for an argument.

The flex is NOT a starting position. WR, TE RB is a position.

Flex is an OPTION as to what of those 3 positions you can use the. It should be FLEXIBLE who/when that player is placed in that linep place.....

Please show me where it states the Flex is a perminent submitted spot in a lineup.....

3' greg will responed to you. from what i know, he's never allowed this in the past. YOU picked your flex player.

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Sun Oct 23, 2005 6:08 am

Originally posted by BillyWaz:
Like I tell Snake, "I would rather win one big one and be bad the rest of the time (which I don't think Gekko is) than be mediocre all of the time.
nag is only 1/4 in making the playoffs in the wcoff/nffc. if he happens to go 0/2 this year (and i was his financial advisor), i'd tell him to give up fantasy football.

[ October 23, 2005, 12:09 PM: Message edited by: Gordon Gekko ]

mikeybok · Post by **mikeybok** » Sun Oct 23, 2005 6:11 am

Originally posted by 3INTBOY:
I am not looking for an argument.

The flex is NOT a starting position. WR, TE RB is a position.

Flex is an OPTION as to what of those 3 positions you can use there. It should be FLEXIBLE who/when that player is placed in that linep place.....

Please show me where it states the Flex is a perminent submitted spot in a lineup.....

3'

I also do not appreciate having NO REPLY and NO PHONE number to speak with someone in case of a lineup submission problem. This is not a problem if you put the early/earliest games in the WR / RB positions ... and put the last player at Flex. Why didn't you play Chambers at WR? Did you think he might become a TE mid week or something? You say you don't want an argument ... but you sure are bad mouthing others for your lineup mistake. Did you not think players would lock as their games started? Why would this week be any exception?

I feel your pain ... I learned from making the same mistake ... it's called wisdom. I just didn't blame others for it (I realized it was a learning curve). Get over it ... and be smarter next time.

UYT

3INTBOY · Post by **3INTBOY** » Sun Oct 23, 2005 6:14 am

I'll do it this way.

The WCOFF does not "lock" a flex player as a Flex. They simply play a position.
THAT FILLS THE FLEX SPOT

I don't need any LESSONS. Thanks.

I NEED the lineup submission to be FLEXIBLE.

Greg will fix it I'm sure.

Show me where it says that flex spot is LOCKED as a position.....
And that poition is then FILLED w/o change based on game start times!

Absurd.

5. Starting Lineup Requirements: Starting lineups will consist of:
1 Quarterback
2 Running Backs
3 Wide Receivers
1 Tight End
1 Flex Player (RB, WR or TE)
1 Kicker
1 Team Defense/Specials Team

3'

[ October 23, 2005, 12:16 PM: Message edited by: 3INTBOY ]