Roster Makeup, Not size

JerseyPaul
Posts: 786
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 6:00 pm

Roster Makeup, Not size

Post by JerseyPaul » Mon Oct 04, 2004 12:16 pm

Does anybody disagree with the last post?

Gordon Gekko
Posts: 7222
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 6:00 pm

Roster Makeup, Not size

Post by Gordon Gekko » Mon Oct 04, 2004 12:17 pm

Originally posted by JerseyPaul:
Does anybody disagree with the last post? yes. sorry. you almost tricked me into saying no.

[ October 04, 2004, 06:19 PM: Message edited by: Gordon Gekko ]
Is my "weekend warrior" prep better than your prep?

richieprimo
Posts: 818
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 6:00 pm

Roster Makeup, Not size

Post by richieprimo » Mon Oct 04, 2004 12:44 pm

Originally posted by JerseyPaul:
Does anybody disagree with the last post? I absolutely agree with you, JP. Well said. I would bet that over 75% of the team owners would agree with you as well. Let's try to get Tom and Greg to consider it.

Richie Primo
Grid Reapers
Paying Top Dollar For All 12 and 10 cent Superhero Comics. Send PM...You may have money packed in your garage or attic.

richieprimo
Posts: 818
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 6:00 pm

Roster Makeup, Not size

Post by richieprimo » Mon Oct 04, 2004 12:46 pm

For next season, I mean...
Paying Top Dollar For All 12 and 10 cent Superhero Comics. Send PM...You may have money packed in your garage or attic.

JerseyPaul
Posts: 786
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 6:00 pm

Roster Makeup, Not size

Post by JerseyPaul » Mon Oct 04, 2004 1:35 pm

Originally posted by Al Swearengen:
For next season, I mean... Of course.

dgamblnman
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 6:00 pm

Roster Makeup, Not size

Post by dgamblnman » Mon Oct 04, 2004 1:47 pm

Originally posted by JerseyPaul:
Does anybody disagree with the last post? Damn you people, you're making me agree again with GG. Yes, I disagree. You're making it easier for the less savvy owners with the setup.

This isn't about easy, it's about hard. It's tough to decide the way to go with drafting, that is why many of us put many hours into research (and some have teams of people). To use the best (you thier minds) stategy in this format. Yes, we are being forced to draft a certain why (if that is how you want to put it), but you have aa choice, and the better owners will make that hard decision. If you win, you are concidered the best.

I have always been a proponenet of making the elite events (this and WCOFF) as hard as possible. It should be, that is why golf have black tees, bowling has sport condition oil, etc. To make it harder than normal so the better players come out on top. I'm still of the belief we should have 20 man rosters (shut up shamu or tamu or whomever, just trying to make a point). While most are trying to make it easier, I think it should be hard. Otherwise, jsut get 8 guys to put in 1250 and play a league off of yahoo.

BONGIZMO
Posts: 1005
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 6:00 pm

Roster Makeup, Not size

Post by BONGIZMO » Mon Oct 04, 2004 2:20 pm

Well it appears Vegas, Myself and Gekk are in agreement against Al and Jersey. Obviously early but not working towards the landslide 75% y'all are thinking with a vote. Vegas hits the nail on the head about keeping it hard and elite. If you want variety, throw QB into the flex but don't go adding more flex positions...Greg I know you are a traditionialist at heart in Bases, well some of us 'football guys' feel that way with FFL.
Never do card tricks for the people you play poker with.

Gordon Gekko
Posts: 7222
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 6:00 pm

Roster Makeup, Not size

Post by Gordon Gekko » Mon Oct 04, 2004 2:30 pm

Originally posted by BONGIZMO:
Well it appears Vegas, Myself and Gekk are in agreement against Al and Jersey. if greg was seriously considering this, i'd have to rev up the engine. i could post a page or two on it, but i don't really have the time to get in another 12 page discussion about a new topic.
Is my "weekend warrior" prep better than your prep?

Post Reply