SNAKEtakes for 2007 NFL Playoffs

pizzatyme
Posts: 3528
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:00 pm

SNAKEtakes for 2007 NFL Playoffs

Post by pizzatyme » Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:13 pm

Originally posted by Diesel:
Since I'm in the Pickem contest, I don't want to divulge too much info, but I see M.B. III having a career day next week. I'm a Giants fan, but I'd stay far, far away from this game. Marc, IMO only if TO is healthy. Otherwise, I see the Giants focusing on Witten and playing the run. Duh I know, Captain Obvious.
2008- Didn't finish last overall in the Classic.
2009- Didn't finish last overall in the Classic or Primetime.

User avatar
Diesel
Posts: 5887
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 6:00 pm

SNAKEtakes for 2007 NFL Playoffs

Post by Diesel » Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:37 am

Graham was a little banged up this week, but there were a few screen passes that I thought may have gone for more yardage if the situation was right. I have a feeling M.B.III will make those screens into some huge fantasy numbers. MB3 will be on one of my Fantasy911 rosters, to at least show I'm not blowing smoke up your arsh...lol...I really believe in what I'm saying. ;)
*Ranked #1 Average Fantasy Football Player in the Nation 2004-2013

"Fantasy sports are all about LUCK. Except when I win."

Team Canada
Posts: 310
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 6:00 pm

SNAKEtakes for 2007 NFL Playoffs

Post by Team Canada » Mon Jan 07, 2008 3:56 am

I had to take the jags at 3 therefore I'm down 10% juice... Snake do you give free game time lines lol?
2008 double playoffs!!

King of Queens
Posts: 5262
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 6:00 pm

SNAKEtakes for 2007 NFL Playoffs

Post by King of Queens » Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:46 am

Updated lines:

Packers (-8) vs. Seahawks (40)
Patriots (-13) vs. Jaguars (48)
Colts (-8.5) vs. Chargers (46.5)
Cowboys (-7.5) vs. Giants (47)

Looks like heavy action going towards the Patriots thus far.

BillyWaz
Posts: 10913
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 6:00 pm

SNAKEtakes for 2007 NFL Playoffs

Post by BillyWaz » Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:01 pm

Originally posted by SNAKE:
quote:Originally posted by King of Queens:
I like all the favorites next week -- don't see these games as being even remotely close:

Packers (-8) over Seahawks
Patriots (-11.5) over Jaguars
Colts (-8) over Chargers
Cowboys (-7.5) over Giants

I'll await the SNAKEtake on these games with bated breath. ...and here, comrades, are the MUCH anticipated SNAKEtakes for Week 2 of the NFL Playoffs...


Packers -8 over Seahawks
Patriots -11.5 over Jags
Colts -8 over Chargers
Giants + 7.5 over Cowgirls


...take it to the bank...SNAKE
[/QUOTE]Uh Oh Snake.....

I agree totally on these three

Packers -8 over Seahawks
Colts -8 over Chargers
Giants + 7.5 over Cowgirls

and I'm not yet sure about the Pats, however good news for you, I am leaning towards the points (but FYI Jacksonville is +13 now, not 11.5).

BillyWaz
Posts: 10913
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 6:00 pm

SNAKEtakes for 2007 NFL Playoffs

Post by BillyWaz » Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:17 pm

Originally posted by SNAKE:
quote:Originally posted by BillyWaz:
quote:Originally posted by SNAKE:
quote:Originally posted by King of Queens:
I like all the favorites next week -- don't see these games as being even remotely close:

Packers (-8) over Seahawks
Patriots (-11.5) over Jaguars
Colts (-8) over Chargers
Cowboys (-7.5) over Giants

I'll await the SNAKEtake on these games with bated breath. ...and here, comrades, are the MUCH anticipated SNAKEtakes for Week 2 of the NFL Playoffs...


Packers -8 over Seahawks
Patriots -11.5 over Jags
Colts -8 over Chargers
Giants + 7.5 over Cowgirls


...take it to the bank...SNAKE
[/QUOTE]Uh Oh Snake.....

I agree totally on these three

Packers -8 over Seahawks
Colts -8 over Chargers
Giants + 7.5 over Cowgirls

and I'm not yet sure about the Pats, however good news for you, I am leaning towards the points (but FYI Jacksonville is +13 now, not 11.5).
[/QUOTE]...it's all good...last week you went 1-3...this week expect to go 3-1...SNAKE
[/QUOTE]Where is the line on New England -11.5. I realize it opened at that, but when you post on Tuesday night and the line has moved 1.5 points THAT should be the line we go by here.

Don't you agree?

Post Reply