Having a "drops" committee

ultimatefs · Post by **ultimatefs** » Sat Nov 17, 2007 6:52 pm

Originally posted by CC's Desperados:
quote:Originally posted by Ted's Cracked Head:
Good try Billy but administering the game itself and the interpretation of the rules must be done by the owners of the challenge. Involving "players" in this process would not be kosher.

Greg and Tom are the only ones who should be making these decisions.

A committee would be a good idea moving forward to discuss ways to make this process better next year. I agree 100% [/QUOTE]No, I think Greg and Tom should appoint a committee of those owner(s) that never, can't, or are to stubborn to comprehend both sides of an issue.

sportsbettingman · Post by **sportsbettingman** » Sat Nov 17, 2007 7:36 pm

Originally posted by JohnZ:
quote:Originally posted by CC's Desperados:
quote:Originally posted by Ted's Cracked Head:
Good try Billy but administering the game itself and the interpretation of the rules must be done by the owners of the challenge. Involving "players" in this process would not be kosher.

Greg and Tom are the only ones who should be making these decisions.

A committee would be a good idea moving forward to discuss ways to make this process better next year. I agree 100% [/QUOTE]No, I think Greg and Tom should appoint a committee of those owner(s) that never, can't, or are to stubborn to comprehend both sides of an issue.

[/QUOTE]Wouldn't sound logic dictate that if you are enrolled in this event...that you are no better than any other enrolled in this event?

So this "judges pool" needs to be formed from people outside of this event...and not friends nor family.

~Lance

BillyWaz · Post by **BillyWaz** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:45 am

Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:
bad idea. most owners participating in the nffc will "vote" with their best interests in mind. COUNT ON IT That is kind of the point isn't it?

What I mean is Greg and Tom would pick guys who they felt had the NFFC in their best interest (not themselves).

My feeling on having more people involved is like what I tell kids in school about grades. When kids complain about too many things being graded, I tell them it is because it is a better indicator of what kind of student they are.

The more data (years, people, etc.) you can take on something the more accurate it will be.

This truly was VERY good in allowing/not allowing trades go through in my other league.

Again, I don't have a problem with Greg or Tom solely doing this either, but it is quite obvious that some do, and I was just bringing up a suggestion.

BillyWaz · Post by **BillyWaz** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:48 am

Originally posted by JerseyPaul:
First it should be clarified that the issue is not "no drop" but "frozen from pickup". That is correct Paul.

Sound Advice · Post by **Sound Advice** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 1:15 am

Originally posted by Ted's Cracked Head:

Good try Billy, but administering the game itself and the interpretation of the rules must be done by the owners of the challenge. Involving "players" in this process would not be kosher.

Greg and Tom are the only ones who should be making these decisions.

quote:Originally posted by sportsbettingman:Wouldn't sound logic dictate that if you are enrolled in this event...that you are no better than any other enrolled in this event?

~Lance [/QUOTE]Beautifully orated by 2 eloquent and fair minded managers.

bald is beautiful · Post by **bald is beautiful** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 2:14 am

Just what we need. More government. BWaz must be a democrat.

Greg Ambrosius · Post by **Greg Ambrosius** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 2:16 am

Originally posted by SNAKE:
quote:Originally posted by King of Queens:
me me me!!

Greg would never pick me, as I never make the right call. DOUBLE

It's a good idea. Greg and Tom can act as the Executive branch, the Council of 13 would be the Legislative branch...and SNAKE could be the Judicial branch. ...as King of IQ has brilliantly suggested here, SNAKE would like to officially throw his name in the ring here for Head of the Judicial Committee...hmmm, will it be the guillotine or the noose?...SNAKE [/QUOTE]All cuts are posted each Monday morning. Tom and I do our best to look them over right away. You are free to comment on anything you see there along with Billy and everyone else. We'll take ALL of your input into our decisions.

Ted's Cracked Head · Post by **Ted's Cracked Head** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 4:55 am

Actually this is already in place on the MB.

This week as an example:

Greg or Tom posted the McNabb thing saying they would make a decision in a day or two.

We all had the chance to air our thoughts for consideration but no one did.

They then ruled.

If the mob had addressed this issue prior to the ruling, then maybe McNabb might have been pulled.

Absent any comments from the peanut gallery, they made their decision.

Next!