Lineup Flex option question.

Hard heads · Post by **Hard heads** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 8:13 am

Something I have thought about that may add some interest to drafting and weekly lineups, have you even considered having 2 flex options. How about these lineup requirements:
1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR,1 Flex(RB or WR), 1 Flex(WR or TE), 1 K and 1 Def/ST
Just with the new growth in TE value maybe for som eof us who drafted Gates and Shockey(still regret that one) it adds a new nuiansce to the lineup decisions.
Just a thought, shoot me down now....

D-Day Heroes · Post by **D-Day Heroes** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 8:28 am

If were going to add to the Roster lets add " IDP " , its time Defence got some respect, IMHO

KAPEFEAR2 · Post by **KAPEFEAR2** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 9:19 am

Hard Heads, I've been playing Winslow and Watson for most of the year.I don't see were the benefit or addition of your suggestion would be exciting.

TradeStar28 · Post by **TradeStar28** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 10:14 am

Originally posted by Hard heads:
Something I have thought about that may add some interest to drafting and weekly lineups, have you even considered having 2 flex options. How about these lineup requirements:
1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR,1 Flex(RB or WR), 1 Flex(WR or TE), 1 K and 1 Def/ST
I added this up and see 9 roster starts ? Furthermore, I dont see a place where you put the possibility of 2 TE's unless you meant -

1 QB
2 RB
2 WR
1 TE
1 Flex (RB or WR)
1 Flex (WR or TE)
1 K
1 Defense

Hard heads · Post by **Hard heads** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 12:22 pm

My bad I left out the actual TE position. It just adds some starting lineup flexinility is all.

Hard heads · Post by **Hard heads** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 12:57 pm

Sorry Kapefear2,
my point was that as is if you have 2 solid TE's you are forced to sit a possible 3rd RB not allowing you to possibly maximize your best lineup. Say you are weak at WR and solid at RB and TE, how can you possibly put your best lineup on the field?