Flex Option

Ted's Cracked Head · Post by **Ted's Cracked Head** » Mon Jun 11, 2007 12:01 pm

This is a necessary change if it can be done. It gives the players a chance to maximize their score and almost complete control over their game day rosters. Another timely and productive discussion led by GG.

3INTBOY · Post by **3INTBOY** » Mon Jun 11, 2007 12:24 pm

Originally posted by Ted's Cracked Head:
This is a necessary change if it can be done. It gives the players a chance to maximize their score and almost complete control over their game day rosters. Another timely and productive discussion led by GG. Whoa...champ.
This discussion was led by a rookie player known as ME

Mr. GG spent three days ripping me about not knowing what the hell I was doing, now he comes back and places himself on the right side of the argument.
Just a heads up as a public service announcement...I don't need the credit, but it shouldn't go into John Kerry's hands either

3'

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:45 pm

Originally posted by 3INTBOY/BFDFANTASY.com:
quote:Originally posted by Ted's Cracked Head:
This is a necessary change if it can be done. It gives the players a chance to maximize their score and almost complete control over their game day rosters. Another timely and productive discussion led by GG. Whoa...champ.
This discussion was led by a rookie player known as ME

Mr. GG spent three days ripping me about not knowing what the hell I was doing, now he comes back and places himself on the right side of the argument.
Just a heads up as a public service announcement...I don't need the credit, but it shouldn't go into John Kerry's hands either

3' [/QUOTE]1. You didn't know what you were doing, obviously.
2. I'm following up on a change that would improve nffc gameplay. I don't remember you following up on it. Sorry if that frightens you.

Nag' · Post by **Nag'** » Mon Jun 11, 2007 2:31 pm

Mark, no need to get pissy. I remember that thread well and you WERE on the wrong side of the issue and ripped into Lou pretty good. He's simply stating a fact.

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Mon Jun 11, 2007 2:48 pm

Originally posted by Nag':
Mark, no need to get pissy. I remember that thread well and you WERE on the wrong side of the issue and ripped into Lou pretty good. He's simply stating a fact. I'm not sure what was pissy about my post. If anybody was pissy, it would have to be lou's post. Maybe he just wanted to post again to advertise his site.

As for me, I was on the wrong side of what? The rules and procedures that were in place at the time of lou's miss? I don't think so. Lou obviously didn't know the nffc procedures. That's the fact. If that's pissy, so be it.

Ted's Cracked Head · Post by **Ted's Cracked Head** » Mon Jun 11, 2007 3:54 pm

Lou, I didn't mean anything other than recognizing GG for bringing the issue back to the forefront. Whoever thought of this did a good thing and GG did a good thing by giving it a push right now. Thanks to both.

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Mon Jun 11, 2007 4:04 pm

Originally posted by Ted's Cracked Head:
Lou, I didn't mean anything other than recognizing GG for bringing the issue back to the forefront. Whoever thought of this did a good thing and GG did a good thing by giving it a push right now. Thanks to both. thanks rob. now, hopefully stats will be able to make this functional and improve nffc gameplay

Nag' · Post by **Nag'** » Mon Jun 11, 2007 4:20 pm

Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:
As for me, I was on the wrong side of what? The rules and procedures that were in place at the time of lou's miss? I don't think so. Lou obviously didn't know the nffc procedures. That's the fact. If that's pissy, so be it.Stop it. It wasn't a "rule" or a "procedure" issue. It was a SOFTWARE issue and it still is. A few fairminded people DID side with Lou back then while you led the wolfpack on the attack. Now you're on the right side of the issue and that's good but let's not play revisionist history and move on.