Who's a better start

King of Queens
Posts: 5262
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 6:00 pm

Who's a better start

Post by King of Queens » Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:35 am

Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:
quote:Originally posted by King of Queens:
quote:Originally posted by BillyWaz:
While Garcia clearly has the better matchup, I don't think you can ever bench Manning.

Unless you have Brady! Or Roethlisberger
[/QUOTE]Or Lemon!!!
[/QUOTE]That's Cleo, Mr. Lemon if you're nasty

renman
Posts: 2837
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 6:00 pm

Who's a better start

Post by renman » Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:48 am

Fair question,

Keep in mind the Jags offense has come to life and Jones-Drew has been explosive. If the Jags can score some it will force Manning to be aggressive and ultimately put up nice points.

I would go Manning but you are not nuts to consider Garcia.

The Lawn Jocky
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 6:00 pm

Who's a better start

Post by The Lawn Jocky » Thu Oct 18, 2007 2:55 pm

Thanks for the feed back all. Just thought that Garcia might have something to prove to the Lions and J.J. ..... DYNOMITE!!!!!!!......I mean Roy (talk some smack) Willams. Listen if you ask me ..to this point Garcia is in the running for League M.V.P. But I do know Manning is almost a must start everyweek. And Patrick you'll C. Good luck to you all!

mkrucek
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 6:00 pm

Who's a better start

Post by mkrucek » Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:00 am

Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:
quote:Originally posted by 4D:
If the Detroit defense were given 2 years to prepare could they really stop anybody? good one 4d :D [/QUOTE]GG, have you noticed the blank stare that has developed on Caoh Rod's face? I think Martz has hypnotized him and whenever Rod thinks defense Martz says the majic word and the thought leaves his mind. We're back to the Martz motto - the quickest way back to get the ball back to our offense is to let them score.
You'll be fine long as your pretty face holds out, then it's gonna get pretty cold out...

bald is beautiful
Posts: 1375
Joined: Sat May 22, 2004 6:00 pm

Who's a better start

Post by bald is beautiful » Fri Oct 19, 2007 7:05 am

Originally posted by 4D:
If the Detroit defense were given 2 years to prepare could they really stop anybody? Only by drafting 11 new defensive starters during those 2 years.

mkrucek
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 6:00 pm

Who's a better start

Post by mkrucek » Sat Oct 20, 2007 2:35 am

Originally posted by bald is beautiful:
quote:Originally posted by 4D:
If the Detroit defense were given 2 years to prepare could they really stop anybody? Only by drafting 11 new defensive starters during those 2 years. [/QUOTE]So now you're putting this on Matt Millen's shoulders? OK, two years won't be nearly enough. Heck, Matt will never have enough time to right this ship.
You'll be fine long as your pretty face holds out, then it's gonna get pretty cold out...

MGB MARTY
Posts: 223
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:00 pm

Who's a better start

Post by MGB MARTY » Sat Oct 20, 2007 5:13 am

As a less than thrilled Bulger owner. Do you start him at Sea? Other options are Griese at Chi or Huard at KC. Almost feel obligated to start him based on picking him in late 4th round.


Marty

Captain Hook
Posts: 1557
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 6:00 pm

Who's a better start

Post by Captain Hook » Sat Oct 20, 2007 5:34 am

If Griese is at Chi I might start him - depends on who his new receivers would be :D

Post Reply