2009 NFFC/NBC Dates and Locations?

Greg Ambrosius · Post by **Greg Ambrosius** » Sun Nov 16, 2008 1:42 am

Originally posted by Raiders:
Greg,

Why not just go with 3 cities(sites) for 2009? Texas,NO and Atanta, do You think the 4th city(site) is worth it? But I would not do NO over say Texas or Atlanta. But again money wise it would make sence to just go with 3 sites.

John Well, we wouldn't add a fourth city just to lose money, I can tell you that. The goal is to attract as many participants as possible to the events and if we can get 3-4 leagues for both events in another city, we'll certainly do it.

Raiders · Post by **Raiders** » Sun Nov 16, 2008 1:45 am

Originally posted by Greg Ambrosius:
quote:Originally posted by Raiders:
Greg,

Why not just go with 3 cities(sites) for 2009? Texas,NO and Atanta, do You think the 4th city(site) is worth it? But I would not do NO over say Texas or Atlanta. But again money wise it would make sence to just go with 3 sites.

John Well, we wouldn't add a fourth city just to lose money, I can tell you that. The goal is to attract as many participants as possible to the events and if we can get 3-4 leagues for both events in another city, we'll certainly do it. [/QUOTE]Than Dallas,Texas I think would be your best bet.

BillyWaz · Post by **BillyWaz** » Sun Nov 16, 2008 2:09 am

Originally posted by Greg Ambrosius:
quote:Originally posted by Raiders:
Greg,

Why not just go with 3 cities(sites) for 2009? Texas,NO and Atanta, do You think the 4th city(site) is worth it? But I would not do NO over say Texas or Atlanta. But again money wise it would make sence to just go with 3 sites.

John Well, we wouldn't add a fourth city just to lose money, I can tell you that. The goal is to attract as many participants as possible to the events and if we can get 3-4 leagues for both events in another city, we'll certainly do it. [/QUOTE]Greg,

Can you start a poll with Atlanta and Dallas??

Have choices like...
A. Would DEFINITELY go to __________
B. MAY go to ______________
C. Would NEVER go to _____________

It may help you gauge where you would receive a better turn out.

For the record, I would SERIOUSLY consider Atlanta in 2010, as I already have my plans 99% set for 2009.

I doubt I would ever go to Dallas.

Just one man's opinion.

Raiders · Post by **Raiders** » Sun Nov 16, 2008 3:46 am

Have choices like...
A. Would DEFINITELY go to ___AC______
B. MAY go to _____Memphis_________
C. Would NEVER go to ____Any state without a casio_________.

Thanks for allowing me to play.

John

Raiders · Post by **Raiders** » Sun Nov 16, 2008 4:57 am

The real question is were does GK draft from next year?

John

Captain Hook · Post by **Captain Hook** » Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:56 am

Greg - interesting question on third or fourth locations.....obviously it makes sense to have Las Vegas and NY/NJ location, BUT are there enough teams in FLA or any other location that is PAYS to have those additional locations?

BillyWaz · Post by **BillyWaz** » Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:59 am

I think Chicago always brings enough to warrant having that as a city, and besides, they have Lou Malnati's pizza and Garrett's caramel corn!

I too question whether a 4th city is needed, as Florida (both Orlando and Tampa) didn't seem to work so well.

[ November 19, 2008, 06:00 PM: Message edited by: BillyWaz ]

TradeStar28 · Post by **TradeStar28** » Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:17 pm

Atlantic City...big time yes

Fort Lauderdale or Miami, big time yes

Dallas, meh

Hotlanta, meh

New Orleans, meh

kapefear · Post by **kapefear** » Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:20 pm

How about FOXWOODS or MOGHEGAN SUN??