A very slow 2009 draft

BillyWaz · Post by **BillyWaz** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 1:13 pm

Originally posted by Follow Me:
quote:Originally posted by Rob B:
I would have no problem going 3 or 5 rounds in the next phase to set it up for the other end for phase 3 and then back again and so on.

We are all big kids here and rules like these are meant to be tweaked to ensure that everyone gets a fair shake. This is especially true when working through a concept like this that has never been tried before.

Maybe we go:

3 rounds phase 2
5 rounds phase 3
5 rounds phase 4
3 rounds phase 5

Then finish with 3 and 3?

Wouldn't that accomplish the goal suggested?

No reason we can't address this right now. Just because we started and get four out of the way doesn't mean we cannot adjust on the fly regardless of KDS settings.

I set mine for 12-14 not caring about when I get to start or stop based on the phases. I set mine that way because I wanted to pick on specific turns but I too see the points being made and think we could/should address them now. I suggest leaving it as is for this draft. We knew what we were getting into when we started.

If after the whole draft is complete, we think we need to change it for next year, we can.

Mark
Follow Me [/QUOTE]Agreed.

Ted's Cracked Head · Post by **Ted's Cracked Head** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 1:13 pm

What I am suggesting as an option would only affect the number of rounds for phase two. Not the order. You would still be picking first at 5.1 when we start up again.

Ted's Cracked Head · Post by **Ted's Cracked Head** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 1:15 pm

That is fine with me guys. Anyway we do this is fine with me.

Sabretooth · Post by **Sabretooth** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 1:21 pm

I agree with you mark. But perhaps I am a little
bias at this point:) I like the postion I am in.

Leroy's Aces · Post by **Leroy's Aces** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 1:22 pm

Originally posted by Follow Me:
quote:Originally posted by Rob B:
I would have no problem going 3 or 5 rounds in the next phase to set it up for the other end for phase 3 and then back again and so on.

We are all big kids here and rules like these are meant to be tweaked to ensure that everyone gets a fair shake. This is especially true when working through a concept like this that has never been tried before.

Maybe we go:

3 rounds phase 2
5 rounds phase 3
5 rounds phase 4
3 rounds phase 5

Then finish with 3 and 3?

Wouldn't that accomplish the goal suggested?

No reason we can't address this right now. Just because we started and get four out of the way doesn't mean we cannot adjust on the fly regardless of KDS settings.

I set mine for 12-14 not caring about when I get to start or stop based on the phases. I set mine that way because I wanted to pick on specific turns but I too see the points being made and think we could/should address them now. I suggest leaving it as is for this draft. We knew what we were getting into when we started.

If after the whole draft is complete, we think we need to change it for next year, we can.

Mark
Follow Me [/QUOTE]I agree, as changing mid-draft could lead to some people getting upset. IMO, it is fine for this draft and like Mark said, we all knew the rules going in.

Sabretooth · Post by **Sabretooth** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 1:23 pm

Ok I see after looking at it Rob. Thats fine. I just really didn't like the idea of changing the order at all after we have started.

Leroy's Aces · Post by **Leroy's Aces** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 1:32 pm

Kotrax is texting me his pick....

Leroy's Aces · Post by **Leroy's Aces** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 1:36 pm

OK, he said he wants Torry Holt.

Raiders · Post by **Raiders** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 1:39 pm

Now if Billy can get a hold of Jeff and Jeff we could get the next 4 picks done.

Sabretooth · Post by **Sabretooth** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 1:39 pm

So who is gonna be the first guy with the balls to say 'rookie" ???