NFFC FAAB Deadline Update

Shrink Attack · Post by **Shrink Attack** » Thu Oct 06, 2011 10:13 am

I would be fine with free agent bidding taking place on either Wednesday or Friday, but not both.

I REALLY don't want two Free Agent bidding runs in one week. Even if the Wednesday run is just for the players going on Thursday, those players still have to be considered in the context of all the other available free agents in the entire league. So I don't buy the argument that the Wednesday bidding would be quick or "easy".

For me, it would be just the same as having to go through two full Free Agent bidding periods in one week...no fun.

thegambler · Post by **thegambler** » Thu Oct 06, 2011 10:21 am

the wcoff did two full free agent periods. one on wed and one on fri. they actually went very well....

Greg Ambrosius · Post by **Greg Ambrosius** » Thu Oct 06, 2011 10:58 am

Originally posted by Shrink Attack:
I would be fine with free agent bidding taking place on either Wednesday or Friday, but not both.

I REALLY don't want two Free Agent bidding runs in one week. Even if the Wednesday run is just for the players going on Thursday, those players still have to be considered in the context of all the other available free agents in the entire league. So I don't buy the argument that the Wednesday bidding would be quick or "easy".

For me, it would be just the same as having to go through two full Free Agent bidding periods in one week...no fun. There will not be two FAAB deadlines. Either Wednesday per the rules now or Fridays. We'll know more early next week.

Sack · Post by **Sack** » Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:10 am

"Wednesday per the rules now"

Any change from the format we drafted under is wrong if one person doesn't receive your "update".

Keep things the way the rules read when we drafted these teams, whether it be a $125 Sat or
a high stakes entry. Anything away from this is flat out wrong.

Chi_Town_FEW · Post by **Chi_Town_FEW** » Fri Oct 07, 2011 8:26 am

Originally posted by Sack:
"Wednesday per the rules now"

Any change from the format we drafted under is wrong if one person doesn't receive your "update".

Keep things the way the rules read when we drafted these teams, whether it be a $125 Sat or
a high stakes entry. Anything away from this is flat out wrong. Agree.

RedRyder · Post by **RedRyder** » Sat Oct 08, 2011 4:43 am

Originally posted by Sack:
"Wednesday per the rules now"

Any change from the format we drafted under is wrong if one person doesn't receive your "update".

Keep things the way the rules read when we drafted these teams, whether it be a $125 Sat or
a high stakes entry. Anything away from this is flat out wrong. I also agree.

Syracuse Slappers · Post by **Syracuse Slappers** » Sat Oct 08, 2011 5:11 am

Originally posted by Sack:
"Wednesday per the rules now"

Any change from the format we drafted under is wrong if one person doesn't receive your "update".

Keep things the way the rules read when we drafted these teams, whether it be a $125 Sat or
a high stakes entry. Anything away from this is flat out wrong. I also agree.

shralpilators · Post by **shralpilators** » Sat Oct 08, 2011 5:16 am

I agree also.

hammer · Post by **hammer** » Sat Oct 08, 2011 6:03 am

Just stick with the rules as written. Agree.

Clonedawg · Post by **Clonedawg** » Sat Oct 08, 2011 3:53 pm

Count me in for keeping it on Weds