Now at 5.14 Who would YOU draft at this spot?

Captain Hook
Posts: 1557
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 6:00 pm

Now at 5.14 Who would YOU draft at this spot?

Post by Captain Hook » Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:59 am

Originally posted by mankey87:
i dont see how you take witten here...as he will see more coverage than in years past

peyton seems to be the safest pick...but i might be ready to gamble here and take Grant

if i got who wanted in the first two my pcik would be grant mankey - you have Wayne and DWill as your first two picks......so who do you pick here?

mankey87
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:00 pm

Now at 5.14 Who would YOU draft at this spot?

Post by mankey87 » Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:05 am

ya newbie here and didnt read through the full 30 pages...

i like grant as i originally wrote, but i did not see we had wayne and dwill...

i pick TO here b/c i dont see peyton outperforming say a mcnabb or rogers this year
Texans in 2010!!!

User avatar
RedRyder
Posts: 1266
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 6:00 pm

Now at 5.14 Who would YOU draft at this spot?

Post by RedRyder » Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:07 am

Originally posted by mankey87:
i dont see how you take witten here...as he will see more coverage than in years past

peyton seems to be the safest pick...and u have the connection...

i like TO here as well tho.. Are you drafting out of Vegas?

So, a potential 100 receptions out of your TE position is bad at this spot?

As far as more coverage, exactly who has been able to cover Witten for his career? What happens when Fleix Jones splits out wide, will that be bad for Witten?
@RedRyder

mankey87
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:00 pm

Now at 5.14 Who would YOU draft at this spot?

Post by mankey87 » Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:12 am

am not drafting out of vegas...new york

i see TO having the potential for 80 - 90 receptions with almost guaranteed double digit TDs...

i think people are discounting TOs absence far too much, roy williams does not require near the attention he did

IMO...here to learn as well


annnd i think u can grab a daniels or keller later and not lose more than 20 receptions

[ August 04, 2009, 03:13 PM: Message edited by: mankey87 ]
Texans in 2010!!!

User avatar
RedRyder
Posts: 1266
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 6:00 pm

Now at 5.14 Who would YOU draft at this spot?

Post by RedRyder » Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:45 am

Originally posted by mankey87:
am not drafting out of vegas...new york

i see TO having the potential for 80 - 90 receptions with almost guaranteed double digit TDs...

i think people are discounting TOs absence far too much, roy williams does not require near the attention he did

IMO...here to learn as well

annnd i think u can grab a daniels or keller later and not lose more than 20 receptions Fair enough. What threw me was your love for Ryan Grant at that spot, but since you changed to T.O., can't argue with that.

Welcome to the boards and good luck in your drafts!!

[ August 04, 2009, 05:46 PM: Message edited by: RedRyder ]
@RedRyder

The Franchise
Posts: 734
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:00 pm

Now at 5.14 Who would YOU draft at this spot?

Post by The Franchise » Tue Aug 04, 2009 12:33 pm

Manning
Winning isn't everything, but the will to win is.

Captain Hook
Posts: 1557
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 6:00 pm

Now at 5.14 Who would YOU draft at this spot?

Post by Captain Hook » Tue Aug 04, 2009 1:18 pm

update

Peyton - 3
Housh - 1
Witten - 1
R. Brown - 2
TO - 1


I am letting this go on for more votes - we have always (I think, not going back to count) had double digit votes

[ August 04, 2009, 07:19 PM: Message edited by: Captain Hook ]

Old School
Posts: 1084
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 6:00 pm

Now at 5.14 Who would YOU draft at this spot?

Post by Old School » Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:10 pm

Ronnie Brown

trueblue
Posts: 472
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 6:00 pm

Now at 5.14 Who would YOU draft at this spot?

Post by trueblue » Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:42 pm

housh

bill

Latham
Posts: 153
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 6:00 pm

Now at 5.14 Who would YOU draft at this spot?

Post by Latham » Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:33 pm

Peyton Manning

Post Reply