David Wilson and Stevan Ridley

David U Kennedy
Posts: 641
Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 12:51 pm

Re: David Wilson and Stevan Ridley

Post by David U Kennedy » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:12 am

The Bills were without Gilmore and Byrd. If they were in all of Toms targets might have been blanketed.

User avatar
boutrous11
Posts: 1573
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 6:00 pm

Re: David Wilson and Stevan Ridley

Post by boutrous11 » Tue Sep 10, 2013 10:13 am

would you guys rather have Ridley or Wilson for the rest of the year? I ask because I have a plethora of receivers in my home league and w/ Vereen out I need a back. Jordy for either Ridley or Wilson is what I'm thinking and both teams need a receiver.... I'll still have Julio,Garcon,Gordon,Shorts,Givens.

David U Kennedy
Posts: 641
Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 12:51 pm

Re: David Wilson and Stevan Ridley

Post by David U Kennedy » Tue Sep 10, 2013 10:48 am

Both look pretty shakey. The Giants have nobody else but Coughlin could kill Wilsons value by benching him. Ridley will be the starter till Vereen comes back. Tough call. Keep Wilson based on his huge upside. He could be a 2000 yard back

TR
Posts: 634
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:00 pm

Re: David Wilson and Stevan Ridley

Post by TR » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:06 am

David U Kennedy wrote:Both look pretty shakey. The Giants have nobody else but Coughlin could kill Wilsons value by benching him. Ridley will be the starter till Vereen comes back. Tough call. Keep Wilson based on his huge upside. He could be a 2000 yard back
That's going a bit overboard...no way Ridley gonna be a 2000 yard back

David U Kennedy
Posts: 641
Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 12:51 pm

Re: David Wilson and Stevan Ridley

Post by David U Kennedy » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:44 pm

TR wrote:
David U Kennedy wrote:Both look pretty shakey. The Giants have nobody else but Coughlin could kill Wilsons value by benching him. Ridley will be the starter till Vereen comes back. Tough call. Keep Wilson based on his huge upside. He could be a 2000 yard back
That's going a bit overboard...no way Ridley gonna be a 2000 yard back
I agree. I said Wilson could be a 2000 yard back :lol:

TR
Posts: 634
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:00 pm

Re: David Wilson and Stevan Ridley

Post by TR » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:51 pm

David U Kennedy wrote:
TR wrote:
David U Kennedy wrote:Both look pretty shakey. The Giants have nobody else but Coughlin could kill Wilsons value by benching him. Ridley will be the starter till Vereen comes back. Tough call. Keep Wilson based on his huge upside. He could be a 2000 yard back
That's going a bit overboard...no way Ridley gonna be a 2000 yard back
I agree. I said Wilson could be a 2000 yard back :lol:
MAYBE both of them combined could get 2000 yards :lol:

User avatar
boutrous11
Posts: 1573
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 6:00 pm

Re: David Wilson and Stevan Ridley

Post by boutrous11 » Tue Sep 10, 2013 5:13 pm

i traded jordy for ridley...

David U Kennedy
Posts: 641
Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 12:51 pm

Re: David Wilson and Stevan Ridley

Post by David U Kennedy » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:13 am

Sounds like Wilson will be starter and Jacobs will get goal line and 3rd down duty. Wilson looks like a weak RB2 or decent flex player now.

Sandman62
Posts: 3538
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: RI

Re: David Wilson and Stevan Ridley

Post by Sandman62 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:48 am

The fantasy gods giveth, and they taketh. Wilson was drafted as a high-upside RB2 in the 3rd or 4th round of most drafts. Then Andre Brown goes down and all those owners felt like they'd hit the lottery, and he's elevated to low-end RB1 status. Now there's another viable goal-line back, and he's back to RB2.

Post Reply