David Wilson and Stevan Ridley
-
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 12:51 pm
Re: David Wilson and Stevan Ridley
The Bills were without Gilmore and Byrd. If they were in all of Toms targets might have been blanketed.
- boutrous11
- Posts: 1573
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 6:00 pm
Re: David Wilson and Stevan Ridley
would you guys rather have Ridley or Wilson for the rest of the year? I ask because I have a plethora of receivers in my home league and w/ Vereen out I need a back. Jordy for either Ridley or Wilson is what I'm thinking and both teams need a receiver.... I'll still have Julio,Garcon,Gordon,Shorts,Givens.
-
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 12:51 pm
Re: David Wilson and Stevan Ridley
Both look pretty shakey. The Giants have nobody else but Coughlin could kill Wilsons value by benching him. Ridley will be the starter till Vereen comes back. Tough call. Keep Wilson based on his huge upside. He could be a 2000 yard back
Re: David Wilson and Stevan Ridley
That's going a bit overboard...no way Ridley gonna be a 2000 yard backDavid U Kennedy wrote:Both look pretty shakey. The Giants have nobody else but Coughlin could kill Wilsons value by benching him. Ridley will be the starter till Vereen comes back. Tough call. Keep Wilson based on his huge upside. He could be a 2000 yard back
-
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 12:51 pm
Re: David Wilson and Stevan Ridley
I agree. I said Wilson could be a 2000 yard backTR wrote:That's going a bit overboard...no way Ridley gonna be a 2000 yard backDavid U Kennedy wrote:Both look pretty shakey. The Giants have nobody else but Coughlin could kill Wilsons value by benching him. Ridley will be the starter till Vereen comes back. Tough call. Keep Wilson based on his huge upside. He could be a 2000 yard back
Re: David Wilson and Stevan Ridley
MAYBE both of them combined could get 2000 yardsDavid U Kennedy wrote:I agree. I said Wilson could be a 2000 yard backTR wrote:That's going a bit overboard...no way Ridley gonna be a 2000 yard backDavid U Kennedy wrote:Both look pretty shakey. The Giants have nobody else but Coughlin could kill Wilsons value by benching him. Ridley will be the starter till Vereen comes back. Tough call. Keep Wilson based on his huge upside. He could be a 2000 yard back
- boutrous11
- Posts: 1573
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 6:00 pm
Re: David Wilson and Stevan Ridley
i traded jordy for ridley...
-
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 12:51 pm
Re: David Wilson and Stevan Ridley
Sounds like Wilson will be starter and Jacobs will get goal line and 3rd down duty. Wilson looks like a weak RB2 or decent flex player now.
Re: David Wilson and Stevan Ridley
The fantasy gods giveth, and they taketh. Wilson was drafted as a high-upside RB2 in the 3rd or 4th round of most drafts. Then Andre Brown goes down and all those owners felt like they'd hit the lottery, and he's elevated to low-end RB1 status. Now there's another viable goal-line back, and he's back to RB2.